arrow
Return

MEG Sensor Selection for Neural Speech Decoding

delete2020-01-01
delete24
delete
OA
AI
D
Debadatta Dash
A
Alan Wisler
P
Paul Ferrari
E
Elizabeth M. Davenport
J
Joseph A. Maldjian
J
Jun Wang *
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3028831delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Direct decoding of speech from the brain is a faster alternative to current electroencephalography (EEG) speller-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) in providing communication assistance to locked-in patients. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has recently shown great potential as a non-invasive neuroimaging modality for neural speech decoding, owing in part to its spatial selectivity over other high-temporal resolution devices. Standard MEG systems have a large number of cryogenically cooled channels/sensors (200 - 300) encapsulated within a fixed liquid helium dewar, precluding their use as wearable BCI devices. Fortunately, recently developed optically pumped magnetometers (OPM) do not require cryogens, and have the potential to be wearable and movable making them more suitable for BCI applications. This design is also modular allowing for customized montages to include only the sensors necessary for a particular task. As the number of sensors bears a heavy infiuence on the cost, size, and weight of MEG systems, minimizing the number of sensors is critical for designing practical MEG-based BCIs in the future. In this study, we sought to identify an optimal set of MEG channels to decode imagined and spoken phrases from the MEG signals. Using a forward selection algorithm with a support vector machine classifier we found that nine optimally located MEG gradiometers provided higher decoding accuracy compared to using all channels. Additionally, the forward selection algorithm achieved similar performance to dimensionality reduction using a stacked-sparse-autoencoder. Analysis of spatial dynamics of speech decoding suggested that both left and right hemisphere sensors contribute to speech decoding. Sensors approximately located near Broca's area were found to be commonly contributing among the higher-ranked sensors across all subjects.
Keywords:
Autoencoder
brain-computer interface
forward selection algorithm
magnetoencephalography
neural speech decoding
OPM
SVM
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

IEEE Access cover
IEEE Access
IF:
3.6
Papers:
9.8W
Citations:
29.4W

Organization

U
university of texas austin
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 54
U
university of texas system
Scholars:
18.5W
Papers: 15.6W
Citations: 210
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Ciclopirox olamine: an antifungal alternative against cryptococcosis
err2010-07-31
err0
PREAI
errP.C. Oliveira; C.S.Q. Medeiros; D.P.C. Macêdo; S.L. Andrade; M.T.A.L. Correia; S.D. Mesquita; R.G. Lima-Neto; R.P. Neves
errShare
errSave
Field Experiments to Determine Gas Transfer at Gated Sills
err2001-10-01
err0
PREAI
errA. L. Urban; S. L. Hettiarachchi; K. F. Miller; G. P. Kincaid; J. S. Gulliver
errShare
errSave
A Stacked Sparse Autoencoder-Based Detector for Automatic Identification of Neuromagnetic High Frequency Oscillations in Epilepsy
err2018-11-01
err30
errOAAI
errGuo, Jiayang; Yang, Kun; Liu, Hongyi; Yin, Chunli; Xiang, Jing; Li, Hailong; Ji, Rongrong; Gao, Yue
errShare
errSave
Optical Co-registration of MRI and On-scalp MEG
err2019-04-02
err78
errOAAI
errZetter, Rasmus; Livanainen, Joonas; Parkkonen, Lauri
errShare
errSave
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
errShare
errSave
researcher View more