.png){kind=icon}
Return
Memory, metamemory, and conditional statistics
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X00042187.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Koriat & Goldsmith's distinction between encoding processes and metamnemonic decision processes is theoretically and practically important, as is their methodology for separating the two. However, their accuracy measure is a conditional statistic, subject to the unfathomable selection effects that have hindered analogous measures in the past. We also find their arguments concerning basic and applied research mostly beside the point.
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
13.7
Papers:
1.6W
Citations:
1.2W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSave
ShareSave
ShareSaveShareSave
View more