.png){kind=icon}
Return
Meta-Analysis
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word meta-analysis, 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.
Keywords:
education
guide
meta-analysis
statistics
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
8.6
Papers:
4.9W
Citations:
5.1W
Organization
Cited Papers
Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.png)
CIRCULATIONOAAI
CIRCULATIONIF38.6
OAAIShareSave
ShareSaveEffects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes:: benefit and harm in different age subgroupsHEARTOAAI
HEARTIF4.4
OAAIShareSaveShareSave no more
no more