arrow
Return

Methodologies for developing knowledge management systems: an evaluation framework

delete2015-07-13
delete35
PRE
AI
R
Razieh Dehghani *
R
Raman Ramsin
DOI:10.1108/JKM-10-2014-0438delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Purpose - This paper aims to provide a criteria-based evaluation framework for assessing knowledge management system (KMS) development methodologies. Design/methodology/approach - The evaluation criteria have been elicited based on the features expected from a successful KMS. Furthermore, a number of prominent KMS development methodologies have been scrutinized based on the proposed evaluation framework. Findings - It was demonstrated that the proposed evaluation framework is detailed and comprehensive enough to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of KMS development methodologies. It was also revealed that even though the evaluated methodologies possess certain strong features, they suffer from several shortcomings that need to be addressed. Research limitations/implications - The evaluation framework has not been applied to all existing KMS development methodologies; however, the evaluation does cover the most comprehensive methodologies which exist in the research context. Practical implications - The results of this research can be used for the following purposes: organizational goal-based selection of KMS development methodologies, evolution of existing KMS development methodologies and engineering of tailored-to-fit KMS development methodologies. Originality/value - The proposed evaluation framework provides a comprehensive and detailed set of criteria for assessing general, area-specific and context-specific features of KMS development methodologies. KMS developers can select the methodology which best fits their requirements based on the evaluation results. Furthermore, method engineers can extend existing methodologies or engineer new ones so as to satisfy the specific requirements of the project at hand.
Keywords:
Knowledge management
Criteria-based evaluation
Evaluation framework
Knowledge management system development methodology
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Knowledge Management cover
Journal of Knowledge Management
IF:
9.5
Papers:
1.7K
Citations:
1.1W

Organization

S
Sharif University of Technology
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 9.5K
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Electrochemical Detection of TNT at Cobalt Phthalocyanine Mediated Screen‐Printed Electrodes and Application to Detection of Airborne Vapours
err2013-10-11
err0
errOAAI
errJ. Sarah Caygill; Stuart D. Collyer; Joanne L. Holmes; Frank Davis; Séamus P. J. Higson
errShare
errSave
Room-Temperature Quantum Cascade Laser: ZnO/Zn1−x Mg x O Versus GaN/Al x Ga1−x N
err2013-04-04
err0
PREAI
errHung Chi Chou; Anas Mazady; John Zeller; Tariq Manzur; Mehdi Anwar
errShare
errSave
CARDIOTOXICITY ASSOCIATED WITH - MITOXANTRONE
err1984-07-01
err0
PREAI
errR. Stuart-Harris; M. Pearson; I.E. Smith; E.G.J. Olsen
errShare
errSave
Epstein-Barr virus-induced ectopic CD137 expression helps nasopharyngeal carcinoma to escape immune surveillance and enables targeting by chimeric antigen receptors
err2022-03-17
err0
PREAI
errMukul Prasad; Sashigala Ponnalagu; Qun Zeng; Khang Luu; Si Min Lang; Hiu Yi Wong; Man Si Cheng; Meihui Wu; Karthik Mallilankaraman; Radoslaw Mikolaj Sobota; Yan Ting Lim; Loo Chien Wang; Chuan Keng Goh; Kai Xun Joshua Tay; Kwok Seng Loh; Cheng-I. Wang; Wen-Hsien Lee; Boon Cher Goh; Chwee Ming Lim; Herbert Schwarz
errShare
errSave
Truthlikeness and Bayesian estimation
err1986-05-01
err0
PREAI
errIlkka Niiniluoto
errShare
errSave
researcher View more