.png){kind=icon}
Return
Methodology Issues in Implementation Science
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feeca.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Background: Putting evidence into practice at the point of care delivery requires an understanding of implementation strategies that work, in what context and how. Objective: To identify methodological issues in implementation science using 4 studies as cases and make recommendations for further methods development. Research Design: Four cases are presented and methodological issues identified. For each issue raised, evidence on the state of the science is described. Results: Issues in implementation science identified include diverse conceptual frameworks, potential weaknesses in pragmatic study designs, and the paucity of standard concepts and measurement. Conclusions: Recommendations to advance methods in implementation include developing a core set of implementation concepts and metrics, generating standards for implementation methods including pragmatic trials, mixed methods designs, complex interventions and measurement, and endorsing reporting standards for implementation studies.
Keywords:
implementation science
context
methods
Journal
M
IF:
2.8
Papers:
6.8K
Citations:
2.0W
Organization
Cited Papers
The Histories of Well-Documented Maritime Cyclones as Portrayed by an Automated Tracking Method
.png){kind=icon}
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveQuality and Cost Analysis of Nurse Staffing, Discharge Preparation, and Postdischarge Utilization
OAAI
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more