.png){kind=icon}
Return
(Mis)perceiving cooperativeness
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.020.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Cooperation is crucial for the success of social interactions. Given its importance, humans should readily be able to use available cues to predict how likely others are to cooperate. Here, we review the empirical literature on how accurate such predictions are. To this end, we distinguish between three classes of cues: behavioral (including past decisions), personal (including gender, attractiveness, and group membership) and situational (including the benefits to cooperation and the ability to communicate with each other). We discuss (i) how each cue correlates with future cooperative decisions and (ii) whether people correctly anticipate each cue's predictive value. We find that people are fairly accurate in interpreting behavioral and situational cues. However, they often misperceive the value of personal cues.
Keywords:
Perception
Cooperation
Social behavior
Cues
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
6.9
Papers:
3.2K
Citations:
1.4W
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSaveHumans display a 'cooperative phenotype' that is domain general and temporally stable.png)
NATURE COMMUNICATIONSOAAI
NATURE COMMUNICATIONSIF15.7
OAAIShareSaveBeliefs about others' intentions determine whether cooperation is the faster choiceSCIENTIFIC REPORTSOAAI
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSIF3.9
OAAIShareSaveThe impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groupsAMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEWOAAI
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEWIF11.6
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more