arrow
Return

Missing Data in Clinical Research: A Tutorial on Multiple Imputation

delete2021-09-01
delete351
delete
OA
AI
P
Peter C. Austin *
I
Ian R. White
D
Douglas S. Lee
S
Stef van Buuren
DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.11.010delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Missing data is a common occurrence in clinical research. Missing data occurs when the value of the variables of interest are not measured or recorded for all subjects in the sample. Common approaches to addressing the presence of missing data include complete-case analyses, where subjects with missing data are excluded, and mean-value imputation, where missing values are replaced with the mean value of that variable in those subjects for whom it is not missing. However, in many settings, these approaches can lead to biased estimates of statistics (eg, of regression coefficients) and/or confidence intervals that are artificially narrow. Multiple imputation (MI) is a popular approach for addressing the presence of missing data. With MI, multiple plausible values of a given variable are imputed or filled in for each subject who has missing data for that variable. This results in the creation of multiple completed data sets. Identical statistical analyses are conducted in each of these complete data sets and the results are pooled across complete data sets. We provide an introduction to MI and discuss issues in its implementation, including developing the imputation model, how many imputed data sets to create, and addressing derived variables. We illustrate the application of MI through an analysis of data on patients hospitalised with heart failure. We focus on developing a model to estimate the probability of 1-year mortality in the presence of missing data. Statistical software code for conducting MI in R, SAS, and Stata are provided.
Keywords:
VALIDATION
MORTALITY
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Canadian Journal of Cardiology cover
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
IF:
5.3
Papers:
8.1K
Citations:
1.0W

Organization

U
University College London
Scholars:
7.9W
Papers: 6.2W
Citations: 15.7W
U
university of toronto
Scholars:
14.8W
Papers: 12.0W
Citations: 165
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Effectiveness of Public Report Cards for Improving the Quality of Cardiac Care The EFFECT Study: A Randomized Trial
err2009-12-02
err206
PREAI
errTu, Jack V.; Donovan, Linda R.; Lee, Douglas S.; Wang, Julie T.; Austin, Peter C.; Alter, David A.; Ko, Dennis T.
errShare
errSave
Calcium–Sensing Receptor: Regulation of Electrolyte Transport in the Thick Ascending Limb of Henle's Loop
err1999-02-06
err0
PREAI
errE. Desfleurs; M. Wittner; S. Simeone; S. Pajaud; G. Moine; R. Rajerison; A. Di Stefano
errShare
errSave
Bilateral Pedunculopontine Nucleus Stimulation for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
err2015-01-31
err0
PREAI
errParesh K. Doshi; Joy D. Desai; Bharati Karkera; Pettarusp M. Wadia
errShare
errSave
Multiple Imputation of Squared Terms
err2013-09-30
err19
PREAI
errVink, Gerko; van Buuren, Stef
errShare
errSave
Missing covariate data in clinical research: when and when not to use the missing-indicator method for analysis
err2012-02-27
err316
errOAAI
errGroenwold, Rolf H. H.; White, Ian R.; Donders, Rogier T.; Carpenter, James R.; Altman, Douglas G.; Moons, Karel G. M.
errShare
errSave
Nuclear Retention Elements of U3 Small Nucleolar RNA
err2023-03-28
err0
errOAAI
errWayne Speckmann; Aarthi Narayanan; Rebecca Terns; Michael P. Terns
errShare
errSave
Prospective Validation of the Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade for Acute Heart Failure The ACUTE Study
err2019-02-26
err78
errOAAI
errLee, Douglas S.; Lee, Jacques S.; Schull, Michael J.; Borgundvaag, Bjug; Edmonds, Marcia L.; Ivankovic, Maria; McLeod, Shelley L.; Dreyer, Jonathan F.; Sabbah, Sam; Levy, Phillip D.; O'Neill, Tara; Chong, Alice; Stukel, Therese A.; Austin, Peter C.; Tu, Jack V.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more