1
Return

Mnemonic mechanisms of emotion regulation: the role of retrieval perspective in managing anger and shame

delete2026-03-01
delete0
PRE
AI
S
Sezin Öner *
C
Caglar, Emine Seyma
D
Donerkayali, Ceren
N
Nur Kurtoglu, Zehra
F
Fırat Çağlar Sarıçiçek
DOI:10.1080/09658211.2026.2638236delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Autobiographical remembering plays a crucial role in regulating emotions, yet how the retrieval perspective modulates this function across discrete negative emotions remains unclear. Building on research showing that field and observer perspectives influence memory phenomenology, the present study examined how visual perspective and retrieval goals regulate anger and shame. In two experiments, participants recalled anger- or shame-related autobiographical events from either a field or observer perspective. In Study 1, they engaged in spontaneous subsequent recall, whereas in Study 2, they were instructed to recall a positive memory. Across both studies, participants tended to recall more positive memories after negative ones, supporting mood-incongruent recall and the automatic activation of mnemonic emotion regulation. Instructed recall further enhanced this positivity bias, increasing the vividness and emotional intensity of retrieved memories. The observer perspective was more effective at dampening the emotional impact of anger, whereas the field perspective amplified reliving across both emotions. Overall, findings suggest that memory-based emotion regulation operates through both automatic (Study 1) and goal-directed (Study 2) mechanisms, shaped by the emotional content of memories and the phenomenological characteristics of recall.
Keywords:
Autobiographical memory
emotion regulation
retrieval perspective
discrete emotions
instructed recall

Journal

M
Memory
IF:
2
Papers:
70
Citations:
4.9K

Organization

K
Kadir Has University
Scholars:
580
Papers: 658
Citations: 2
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers