arrow
Return

Modeling Multi-Step Organic Reactions: Can Density Functional Theory Deliver Misleading Chemistry?

delete2024-02-27
delete2
delete
OA
AI
H
Hanwei Li
M
Maryam Mansoori Kermani
A
Alistar Ottochian
O
Orlando Crescenzi
B
Benjamin G. Janesko
D
Donald G. Truhlar *
G
Giovanni Scalmani
M
Michael J. Frisch
I
Ilaria Ciofini
C
Carlo Adamo *
DOI:10.1021/jacs.3c12713delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Many organic reactions are characterized by a complex mechanism with a variety of transition states and intermediates of different chemical natures. Their correct and accurate theoretical characterization critically depends on the accuracy of the computational method used. In this work, we study a complex ambimodal cycloaddition with five transition states, two intermediates, and three products, and we ask whether density functional theory (DFT) can provide a correct description of this type of complex and multifaceted reaction. Our work fills a gap in that most systematic benchmarks of DFT for chemical reactions have considered much simpler reactions. Our results show that many density functionals not only lead to seriously large errors but also differ from one another in predicting whether the reaction is ambimodal. Only a few of the available functionals provide a balanced description of the complex and multifaceted reactions. The parameters varied in the tested functionals are the ingredients, the treatment of medium-range and nonlocal correlation energy, and the inclusion of Hartree-Fock exchange. These results show a clear need for more benchmarks on the mechanisms of large molecules in complex reactions.
Keywords:
MAIN-GROUP THERMOCHEMISTRY
GENERALIZED GRADIENT APPROXIMATION
RANGE-SEPARATED HYBRID
NONCOVALENT INTERACTIONS
DISPERSION CORRECTIONS
NONLOCAL CORRELATION
IMPROVED ACCURACY
BROAD ACCURACY
HARTREE-FOCK
BASIS-SETS

Journal

Journal of the American Chemical Society cover
Journal of the American Chemical Society
IF:
15.6
Papers:
20.0W
Citations:
60.2W

Organization

C
centre national de la recherche scientifique (cnrs)
Scholars:
24.4W
Papers: 18.1W
Citations: 279
U
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Scholars:
3.7W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 58
U
Universite PSL
Scholars:
3.3W
Papers: 2.5W
Citations: 91
researcher View more organizations