1
Return

Modifiers in Effects of Combined Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy versus Pharmacotherapy Alone for Adult Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

delete2026-01-01
delete1
delete
OA
AI
M
Markéta Čihařová *
Z
Zhu, Tengfei
M
Mathias Harrer
E
Erica Weitz
H
Havlik, Jaroslav
A
Arpana Amarnath
T
Toshi A. Furukawa
C
Constantin Yves Plessen
E
Ellen Driessen
C
Claudia Buntrock
L
Lingyao Tong
D
David J. Hellerstein
L
Lisa Wallner Samstag
Y
Ying Chen
S
Sreevani Rentala
C
Curt Hemanny
I
Irismar Reis de Oliveira
B
Blom, Marc B. J.
Y
Y. Burnand
A
Antonio Andreoli
A
Andrea K. Wittenborn
K
Kevin L. Delucchi
N
Nusrat Husain
R
Robert J. DeRubeis
J
Joel M. Town
F
Frank Röhricht
H
Han Choi
J
Jack Dekker
D
David J. A. Dozois
M
Martin B. Keller
R
Raymond W. Lam
F
François Lespérance
G
Giuseppe Maina
G
Gianluca Rosso
J
J Milgrom
A
Arun Ravindran
C
Charles F. Reynolds III
N
Nicola Wiles
B
Brandon A. Gaudiano
L
Livia Hartmann de Souza
A
Atsuo Nakagawa
B
Beatriz Rodríguez Vega
Á
ángela Palao
J
Jaime López Rodríguez
V
Valerio Villamil Salcedo
Z
Zobel, Ingo
E
Elisabeth Schramm
S
Steven D. Hollon
H
Heleen Riper
P
Pim Cuijpers
DOI:10.1159/000550633delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Introduction: It is not clear which individual-patient- and study-level variables modify the effects in the comparison of combined treatment versus pharmacotherapy alone for adult depression. Methods: Randomized trials comparing combined treatment with pharmacotherapy alone were identified on September 1, 2024, and individual participant data (IPD) requested from the authors. One-stage IPD meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effects on depressive symptoms at posttreatment and follow-up, response, remission, and reliable improvement and to assess effect modifiers. Results: Of 75 eligible studies, 31 (41.33%) provided their IPD (3,703 participants). Combined treatment was more effective in reducing depressive symptoms at posttreatment (SMD = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.27-0.64), 6- (SMD = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.25-0.85) and 12-month follow-up (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.02-0.43). The effect size was smaller in studies that provided IPD than in those that did not. No patient-level effect modifiers were identified. No difference between the two arms was found in studies using SSRIs (as opposed to other antidepressants) and recruiting specific target groups (versus unselected adult populations), and the difference between combined treatment and pharmacotherapy alone was larger if pharmacotherapy was not administered adequately, but these findings were not confirmed in sensitivity analyses. Several patient-level characteristics predicted higher depressive symptoms at posttreatment, regardless of treatment condition. Conclusion: Combined treatment outperforms pharmacotherapy alone regardless of individual characteristics. Thus, its delivery does not have to be limited to specific patient subgroups. However, IPD were available for only 41% of eligible studies, thus limiting this sample's representativeness. Plain Language Summary Providing combined treatments to adults with depression who will likely benefit from them may increase effectiveness, but we also need to prevent wasting resources if patients do not need intensive treatments to get better. To understand which treatment works better for whom, we need to know baseline socio-demographic or clinical characteristics which make patients more likely to benefit from one treatment or another, so-called effect modifiers. However, effect modifiers are not known for the comparison between combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and pharmacotherapy alone. Therefore, we conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis, meaning statistical integration of data of specific participants, coming from 31 previous studies, to identify these effect modifiers. Combined treatment was more effective than pharmacotherapy alone, and this was regardless of any socio-demographic or clinical characteristics, such as gender, age, education, ethnicity, severity, or comorbidity. The only lack of difference was found in studies which used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as their antidepressant medication, or those which were conducted in specific subgroups, such as patients with comorbidities. If pharmacotherapy was delivered according to treatment guidelines, the difference between pharmacotherapy alone and combined treatment was smaller. Yet, these findings were not confirmed in subsequent analyses. In addition, several characteristics related to severity and comorbidity, and unemployment, were associated with higher depressive symptoms after treatment, no matter which treatment the participant received. Combined treatment is the best treatment option for depression. Adequately taken pharmacotherapy might decrease the need of additional psychotherapy if psychotherapy is unavailable or not according to patient's wishes.
Keywords:
Combined treatment
Pharmacotherapy
Psychotherapy
Depression
Individual participant data meta-analysis

Journal

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics cover
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
IF:
17.4
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
6.5K

Organization

 
 columbia university
Scholars:
2.3K
Papers: 945
Citations: 0
Long Island University cover
Long Island University
Scholars:
753
Papers: 585
Citations: 872
U
university of liverpool
Scholars:
2.7K
Papers: 1.4K
Citations: 0
U
university of california san francisco
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 67
W
western university (university of western ontario)
Scholars:
2.9W
Papers: 2.7W
Citations: 33
H
howard florey institute affiliates
Scholars:
3.6K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 1
P
Parnassia Psychiatric Institute
Scholars:
509
Papers: 470
Citations: 3
Q
Queen Mary University London
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 326
U
universite de montreal
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 46
H
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Scholars:
9.9K
Papers: 6.2K
Citations: 27
U
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 1.6W
U
University of Pennsylvania
Scholars:
1.0W
Papers: 3.7K
Citations: 11.8W
V
vrije universiteit amsterdam
Scholars:
2.6K
Papers: 1.2K
Citations: 0
U
university of turin
Scholars:
3.9K
Papers: 1.5K
Citations: 0
B
butler hospital rhode island
Scholars:
492
Papers: 460
Citations: 1
A
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga
Scholars:
54
Papers: 26
Citations: 0
S
st marianna university
Scholars:
364
Papers: 121
Citations: 0
U
university turin hospital
Scholars:
287
Papers: 183
Citations: 1
A
austin research institute
Scholars:
3.9K
Papers: 2.8K
Citations: 6
U
university of london
Scholars:
21.3W
Papers: 19.6W
Citations: 302
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
N
new york state psychiatry institute
Scholars:
3.2K
Papers: 2.6K
Citations: 5
S
Sun Moon University
Scholars:
714
Papers: 886
Citations: 728
U
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Scholars:
9.2K
Papers: 5.2K
Citations: 4.3K
R
Radboud University Nijmegen
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.4W
Citations: 5.4W
B
brown university
Scholars:
3.9K
Papers: 1.8K
Citations: 0
M
michigan state university
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 44
U
University of Manchester
Scholars:
5.6W
Papers: 5.2W
Citations: 7.4W
K
kyoto university
Scholars:
6.6K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 0
U
university of pittsburgh
Scholars:
5.1K
Papers: 2.3K
Citations: 1
U
university of toronto
Scholars:
14.5W
Papers: 11.9W
Citations: 165
U
University of British Columbia
Scholars:
6.8W
Papers: 6.1W
Citations: 8.6W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers