Moralization and self-control strategy selection

Samuel Murray

doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02257-7

Moralization and self-control strategy selection

2023-02-27

2

OA

AI

DOI：10.3758/s13423-023-02257-7

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

To manage conflicts between temptation and commitment, people use self-control. The process model of self-control outlines different strategies for managing the onset and experience of temptation. However, little is known about the decision-making factors underlying strategy selection. Across three experiments (N = 317), we tested whether the moral valence of a commitment predicts how people advise attentional self-control strategies. In Experiments 1 and 2, people rated attentional focus strategies as significantly more effective for people tempted to break moral relative to immoral commitments, even when controlling for perceived temptation and trait self-control. Experiment 3 showed that as people perceived commitments to have more positive moral valence, they judged attentional focus strategies to be significantly more effective relative to attentional distraction strategies. Moreover, this effect was partly mediated by perceived differences in motivation. These results indicate that moralization informs decision-making processes related to self-control strategy selection.

Keywords:

Self-control

Strategy

Attention

Distraction

Moralization

Moralization and self-control strategy selection

Abstract

Journal

Organization