.png){kind=icon}
Return
Multistrategy ensemble learning: Reducing error by combining ensemble learning techniques
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1109/TKDE.2004.29.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Ensemble learning strategies, especially Boosting and Bagging decision trees, have demonstrated impressive capacities to improve the prediction accuracy of base learning algorithms. Further gains have been demonstrated by strategies that combine simple ensemble formation approaches. In this paper, we investigate the hypothesis that the improvement in accuracy of multistrategy approaches to ensemble learning is due to an increase in the diversity of ensemble members that are formed. In addition, guided by this hypothesis, we develop three new multistrategy ensemble learning techniques. Experimental results in a wide variety of natural domains suggest that these multistrategy ensemble learning techniques are, on average, more accurate than their component ensemble learning techniques.
Keywords:
boosting
bagging
ensemble learning
committee learning
multiboosting
bias
variance
ensemble diversity
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
10.4
Papers:
6.9K
Citations:
3.2W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
ShareSaveShareSaveAn experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: Bagging, boosting, and randomization.png)
MACHINE LEARNINGOAAI
MACHINE LEARNINGIF2.9
OAAIShareSave
ShareSaveShareSaveAn empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variantsMACHINE LEARNINGOAAI
MACHINE LEARNINGIF2.9
OAAIShareSave no more
no more