.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Nationwide Consequences, Rural Devastation: The Unequal Toll of Public Health Spending Reductions
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
M
O
R
DOI：10.1215/03616878-12262656.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This article examines the implications of recent and proposed reductions in federal public health funding with a focus on how these cuts disproportionately impact rural and low-resource communities. Drawing insight from national datasets, the authors document the increasing reliance of state and local public health systems on federal funds, particularly in the aftermath of COVID-19. Scenario modeling reveals that a rollback to pre-COV ID federal funding levels would likely leave many local jurisdictions unable to sustain core public health services, especially where local fiscal capacity is limited. The authors argue that, while some communities may be able to partially offset federal losses with local revenues, most lack the means to do so at scale, particularly in rural areas already strained by limited infrastructure. This article offers empirical estimates of federal support, evaluates the plausibility of local revenue substitution, and analyzes the consequences of federal disinvestment for the Foundational Public Health Services. These findings underscore a key tension in federalism in which calls for local autonomy amid shrinking federal support risk exacerbating health inequities and eroding core protections, both of which lead to critical questions about the federal government's role and responsibility in ensuring a resilient and equitable public health system.
Keywords:
public health workforce
public health spending
public health systems
politics and public health
Journal
J
IF:
2.8
Papers:
2.5K
Citations:
1.4K
Organization
Cited Papers