arrow
Return

Nonparametric two-sample methods for ranked-set sample data

delete2006-09-01
delete61
PRE
AI
M
Michael A. Fligner *
S
Steven N. MacEachern
DOI:10.1198/016214506000000410delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Anew collection of procedures is developed for the analysis of two-sample, ranked-set samples, providing an alternative to the Bohn-Wolfe procedure. These procedures split the data based on the ranks in the ranked-set sample and lead to tests for the centers of distributions, confidence intervals, and point estimators. The advantages of the new tests are that they require essentially no assumptions about the mechanism by which rankings are imperfect, that they maintain their level whether rankings are perfect or imperfect, that they lead to generalizations of the Bohn-Wolfe procedure that can be used to increase power in the case of perfect rankings, and that they allow one to analyze both balanced and unbalanced ranked-set samples. A new class of imperfect ranking models is proposed, and the performance of the procedure is investigated under these models. When rankings are random, a theorem is presented which characterizes efficient data splits. Because random rankings are equivalent to iid samples, this theorem applies to a wide class of statistics and has implications for a variety of computationally intensive methods.
Keywords:
Mann-Whitney
perceptual error models
pitman efficacy
ranking models
Thurstonian model
Wilcoxon
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

J
Journal of the American Statistical Association
IF:
3
Papers:
5.1K
Citations:
4.8W

Organization

No organization information available