.png){kind=icon}
Return
Novel performance metrics for robust multi-objective optimization algorithms
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.swevo.2014.10.005.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Performance metrics are essential for quantifying the performance of optimization algorithms in the field of evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Such metrics allow researchers to compare different algorithms quantitatively. In the field of robust multi-objective optimization, however, there is currently no performance metric despite its significant importance. This motivates our proposal of three novel specific metrics for measuring the convergence, coverage, and success rate of robust Pareto optimal solutions obtained by robust multi-objective algorithms. The proposed metrics are employed to quantitatively evaluate and compare Robust Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (RMOPSO) and Robust Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (RNSGA-II) on seven selected benchmark problems. The results show that the proposed metrics are effective in quantifying the performance of robust multi-objective algorithms in terms of convergence, coverage, and the ratio of the robust/non-robust Pareto optimal solutions obtained. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Robust multi-objective optimization
Multi-objective optimization
Performance metric
Convergence metric
Coverage metric
Success ratio
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
8.5
Papers:
2.2K
Citations:
1.0W
Organization
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the Strength Pareto approach
PREAI
ShareSave
View more