arrow
Return

On evaluating stream learning algorithms

delete2012-10-24
delete360
delete
OA
AI
J
João Gama *
R
Raquel Sebastião
P
Pedro Pereira Rodrigues
DOI:10.1007/s10994-012-5320-9delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Most streaming decision models evolve continuously over time, run in resource-aware environments, and detect and react to changes in the environment generating data. One important issue, not yet convincingly addressed, is the design of experimental work to evaluate and compare decision models that evolve over time. This paper proposes a general framework for assessing predictive stream learning algorithms. We defend the use of prequential error with forgetting mechanisms to provide reliable error estimators. We prove that, in stationary data and for consistent learning algorithms, the holdout estimator, the prequential error and the prequential error estimated over a sliding window or using fading factors, all converge to the Bayes error. The use of prequential error with forgetting mechanisms reveals to be advantageous in assessing performance and in comparing stream learning algorithms. It is also worthwhile to use the proposed methods for hypothesis testing and for change detection. In a set of experiments in drift scenarios, we evaluate the ability of a standard change detection algorithm to detect change using three prequential error estimators. These experiments point out that the use of forgetting mechanisms (sliding windows or fading factors) are required for fast and efficient change detection. In comparison to sliding windows, fading factors are faster and memoryless, both important requirements for streaming applications. Overall, this paper is a contribution to a discussion on best practice for performance assessment when learning is a continuous process, and the decision models are dynamic and evolve over time.
Keywords:
Data streams
Evaluation design
Prequential analysis
Concept drift

Journal

Machine Learning cover
Machine Learning
IF:
2.9
Papers:
2.7K
Citations:
3.4W

Organization

U
Universidade do Porto
Scholars:
3.0W
Papers: 2.9W
Citations: 34
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

FFT-LB Modeling of Thermal Liquid-Vapor System
err2012-04-19
err0
errOAAI
errYan-Biao Gan; Ai-Guo Xu; Guang-Cai Zhang; Ying-Jun Li
errShare
errSave
Hierarchical clustering of time-series data streams
err2008-05-01
err153
PREAI
errRodrigues, Pedro Pereira; Gama, Joao; Pedroso, Joao Pedro
errShare
errSave
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
errShare
errSave
Tracking the best expert
err1998-01-01
err296
errOAAI
errHerbster, M; Warmuth, MK
errShare
errSave
Perceived Racism as a Predictor of Paranoia Among African Americans
err2006-02-01
err0
PREAI
errDennis R. Combs; David L. Penn; Jeffrey Cassisi; Chris Michael; Terry Wood; Jill Wanner; Scott Adams
errShare
errSave
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
errShare
errSave
researcher View more