.png){kind=icon}
Return
On quantitative spatial economic models
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jue.2021.103348.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
We show that spatial equilibrium conditions in workhorse models of quantitative spatial economics (QSE) can be generated by the McFadden (1974) model together with the condition that the individual choice probability of a region equals the population share of that region. Thus, recent models of QSE and one of the oldest location choice models can rationalize the same change in equilibrium following shocks to economic fundamentals. However, their welfare implications -even conditional on the same change in equilibrium -may differ, depending on the specification of preferences and on the type of shocks we consider.
Keywords:
Quantitative spatial economics
Location choice models
Spatial equilibrium conditions
Welfare
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
4.8
Papers:
2.2K
Citations:
7.3K
Organization
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveHow wages and employment adjust to trade liberalization: Quasi-experimental evidence from Austria
OAAI
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more