.png){kind=icon}
Return
On simultaneous analysis
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00010.x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Arguments for and against combined analysis of multiple data sets in phylogenetic inference are reviewed. Simultaneous analysis of combined data better maximizes cladistic parsimony than separate analyses, hence is to be preferred. Simultaneous analysis on allow ''secondary signals'' to emerge because it measures strength of evidence supporting disparate results. Separate analyses are useful and of interest to understanding the differences among data sets, but simultaneous analysis provides the greatest possible explanatory power, and should always be evaluated when possible. The mechanics of simultaneous analysis are discussed. (C) 1996 The Willi Hennig Society.
Keywords:
TAXONOMIC CONGRUENCE
PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS
CLADISTIC-ANALYSIS
CHARACTER EVOLUTION
AMNIOTE PHYLOGENY
OUTGROUP ANALYSIS
PLANT PHYLOGENY
CONSENSUS TREES
PARSIMONY
HOMOPLASY
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
6.2
Papers:
1.0K
Citations:
3.9K
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more