arrow
Return

One-class remote sensing classification: one-class vs. binary classifiers

delete2018-01-03
delete30
PRE
AI
X
Xueqing Deng
W
Wenkai Li *
X
Xiaoping Liu
郭
郭庆华 (Qinghua Guo)
S
Shawn Newsam
DOI:10.1080/01431161.2017.1416697delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Many applications of remote sensing only require the classification of a single land type. This is known as the one-class classification problem and it can be performed using either binary classifiers, by treating all other classes as the negative class, or one-class classifiers which only consider the class of interest. The key difference between these two approaches is in their training data and the amount of effort needed to produce it. Binary classifiers require an exhaustively labelled training data set while one-class classifiers are trained using samples of just the class of interest. Given ample and complete training data, binary classifiers generally outperform one-class classifiers. However, what is not clear is which approach is more accurate when given the same amount of labelled training data. That is, for a fixed labelling effort, is it better to use a binary or one-class classifier. This is the question we consider in this article. We compare several binary classifiers, including backpropagation neural networks, support vector machines, and maximum likelihood classifiers, with two one-class classifiers, one-class SVM, and presence and background learning (PBL), on the problem of one-class classification in high-resolution remote sensing imagery. We show that, given a fixed labelling budget, PBL consistently outperforms the other methods. This advantage stems from the fact that PBL is a positive-unlabelled method in which large amounts of readily available unlabelled data is incorporated into the training phase, allowing the classifier to model the negative class more effectively.
Keywords:
SUPERVISED IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES
NEURAL-NETWORKS
LAND
PROBABILITY
SET
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

International Journal of Remote Sensing cover
International Journal of Remote Sensing
IF:
2.6
Papers:
1.2W
Citations:
2.7W

Organization

U
University of California Merced
Scholars:
2.3K
Papers: 1.9K
Citations: 2
S
Sun Yat Sen University
Scholars:
9.9W
Papers: 7.2W
Citations: 95
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.7W
Papers: 33.8W
Citations: 6.6K
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Survey on paediatric tumour boards in Europe: current situation and results from the ExPo-r-Net project
err2018-01-08
err0
PREAI
errA. Juan Ribelles; P. Berlanga; G. Schreier; M. Nitzlnader; B. Brunmair; V. Castel; S. Essiaf; A. Cañete; R. Ladenstein
errShare
errSave
Mapping raised bogs with an iterative one-class classification approach
err2016-10-01
err41
PREAI
errMack, Benjamin; Roscher, Ribana; Stenzel, Stefanie; Feilhauer, Hannes; Schmidtlein, Sebastian; Waske, Bjoern
errShare
errSave
Soil effects due to sewage sludge application in agriculture
err1996-01-01
err0
PREAI
errH. H�ni; A. Siegenthaler; T. Candinas
errShare
errSave
Tc99m- hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scintigraphy in clinical practice
err2011-11-01
err0
PREAI
errH. Lambie; A.M. Cook; A.F. Scarsbrook; J.P.A. Lodge; P.J. Robinson; F.U. Chowdhury
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
researcher View more