arrow
Return

Operating two exchange-only qubits in parallel

delete2025-11-26
delete0
delete
OA
AI
M
Mateusz Mądzik *
F
Florian Luthi
G
Gian Giacomo Guerreschi
F
Fahd A. Mohiyaddin
F
Felix Borjans
J
Jason D. Chadwick
M
Matthew Curry
J
Joshua Ziegler
S
Sarah E. Atanasov
P
Peter L. Bavdaz
E
Elliot J. Connors
J
J. Corrigan
H
H. Ekmel Ercan
R
Robert Flory
H
Hubert C. George
B
Benjamin Harpt
E
Eric Henry
M
Mohammad Monirul Islam
N
Nader Khammassi
D
Daniel Keith
L
Lester Lampert
T
Todor Mladenov
A
Aditi Nethwewala
S
Samuel F. Neyens
R
René Otten
L
Linda Patricia Osuna Ibarra
B
Bishnu Patra
R
R. Pillarisetty
S
Shavindra Premaratne
M
Mick Ramsey
A
Andrew Risinger
J
John Rooney
R
Rostyslav Savytskyy
T
Thomas F. Watson
O
Otto Zietz
A
A. Y. Matsuura
S
Stefano Pellerano
N
N. C. Bishop
J
J. M. Roberts
J
James S. Clarke
DOI:10.1038/s41586-025-09767-5delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Semiconductors are among the most promising platforms to implement large-scale quantum computers, as advanced manufacturing techniques allow fabrication of large quantum dot arrays1. Various qubit encodings can be used to store and manipulate quantum information on these quantum dot arrays. Regardless of qubit encoding, precise control over the exchange interaction between electrons confined in quantum dots in the array is critical. Furthermore, it is necessary to execute high-fidelity quantum operations concurrently to make full use of the limited coherence of individual qubits. Here we demonstrate the parallel operation of two exchange-only qubits, consisting of six quantum dots in a linear arrangement. Using randomized benchmarking (RB) techniques, we show that issuing pulses on the five barrier gates to modulate exchange interactions in a maximally parallel way maintains the quality of qubit control relative to sequential operation. The techniques developed to perform parallel exchange pulses can be readily adapted to other quantum-dot-based encodings. Moreover, we show the first, to our knowledge, experimental demonstrations of an iSWAP gate for exchange-only qubits and of a charge-locking Pauli spin blockade (PSB) readout method. The results are validated using cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB)2, a technique useful for performance characterization of larger quantum computing systems; here it is used for the first time on a quantum system based on semiconductor technology. Parallel operation of two exchange-only qubits consisting of six quantum dots arranged linearly is shown to be achievable and maintains qubit control quality compared with sequential operation, with potential for use in scaled quantum computing.
Keywords:
quantum dots
exchange-only qubits
parallel operation
randomized benchmarking
charge-locking Pauli spin blockade
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Nature cover
Nature
IF:
48.5
Papers:
1.8W
Citations:
96.5W

Organization

I
Intel Corporation
Scholars:
2.7K
Papers: 2.0K
Citations: 6
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Reduced Sensitivity to Charge Noise in Semiconductor Spin Qubits via Symmetric Operation
err2016-03-16
err0
errOAAI
errM. D. Reed; B. M. Maune; R. W. Andrews; M. G. Borselli; K. Eng; M. P. Jura; A. A. Kiselev; T. D. Ladd; S. T. Merkel; I. Milosavljevic; E. J. Pritchett; M. T. Rakher; R. S. Ross; A. E. Schmitz; A. Smith; J. A. Wright; M. F. Gyure; A. T. Hunter
errShare
errSave
Universal logic with encoded spin qubits in silicon
err2023-02-06
err0
errOAAI
errAaron J. Weinstein; Matthew D. Reed; Aaron M. Jones; Reed W. Andrews; David Barnes; Jacob Z. Blumoff; Larken E. Euliss; Kevin Eng; Bryan H. Fong; Sieu D. Ha; Daniel R. Hulbert; Clayton A. C. Jackson; Michael Jura; Tyler E. Keating; Joseph Kerckhoff; Andrey A. Kiselev; Justine Matten; Golam Sabbir; Aaron Smith; Jeffrey Wright; Matthew T. Rakher; Thaddeus D. Ladd; Matthew G. Borselli
errShare
errSave
Universal control of four singlet-triplet qubits
err2024-10-31
err0
errOAAI
errZhang, Xin; Morozova, Elizaveta; Rimbach-Russ, Maximilian; Jirovec, Daniel; Hsiao, Tzu-Kan; Farina, Pablo Cova; Wang, Chien-An; Oosterhout, Stefan D.; Sammak, Amir; Scappucci, Giordano; Veldhorst, Menno; Vandersypen, Lieven M. K.
errShare
errSave
Qubits made by advanced semiconductor manufacturing
err2022-03-29
err177
errOAAI
errZwerver, A. M. J.; Krahenmann, T.; Watson, T. F.; Lampert, L.; George, H. C.; Pillarisetty, R.; Bojarski, S. A.; Amin, P.; Amitonov, S., V; Boter, J. M.; Caudillo, R.; Corras-Serrano, D.; Dehollain, J. P.; Droulers, G.; Henry, E. M.; Kotlyar, R.; Lodari, M.; Luthi, F.; Michalak, D. J.; Mueller, B. K.; Neyens, S.; Roberts, J.; Samkharadze, N.; Zheng, G.; Zietz, O. K.; Scappucci, G.; Veldhorst, M.; Vandersypen, L. M. K.; Clarke, J. S.
errShare
errSave
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
err2019-10-23
err0
errOAAI
errFrank Arute; Kunal Arya; Ryan Babbush; Dave Bacon; Joseph C. Bardin; Rami Barends; Rupak Biswas; Sergio Boixo; Fernando G. S. L. Brandao; David A. Buell; Brian Burkett; Yu Chen; Zijun Chen; Ben Chiaro; Roberto Collins; William Courtney; Andrew Dunsworth; Edward Farhi; Brooks Foxen; Austin Fowler; Craig Gidney; Marissa Giustina; Rob Graff; Keith Guerin; Steve Habegger; Matthew P. Harrigan; Michael J. Hartmann; Alan Ho; Markus Hoffmann; Trent Huang; Travis S. Humble; Sergei V. Isakov; Evan Jeffrey; Zhang Jiang; Dvir Kafri; Kostyantyn Kechedzhi; Julian Kelly; Paul V. Klimov; Sergey Knysh; Alexander Korotkov; Fedor Kostritsa; David Landhuis; Mike Lindmark; Erik Lucero; Dmitry Lyakh; Salvatore Mandrà; Jarrod R. McClean; Matthew McEwen; Anthony Megrant; Xiao Mi; Kristel Michielsen; Masoud Mohseni; Josh Mutus; Ofer Naaman; Matthew Neeley; Charles Neill; Murphy Yuezhen Niu; Eric Ostby; Andre Petukhov; John C. Platt; Chris Quintana; Eleanor G. Rieffel; Pedram Roushan; Nicholas C. Rubin; Daniel Sank; Kevin J. Satzinger; Vadim Smelyanskiy; Kevin J. Sung; Matthew D. Trevithick; Amit Vainsencher; Benjamin Villalonga; Theodore White; Z. Jamie Yao; Ping Yeh; Adam Zalcman; Hartmut Neven; John M. Martinis
errShare
errSave
Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking
err2014-06-20
err0
errOAAI
errJ. Kelly; R. Barends; B. Campbell; Y. Chen; Z. Chen; B. Chiaro; A. Dunsworth; A. G. Fowler; I.-C. Hoi; E. Jeffrey; A. Megrant; J. Mutus; C. Neill; P. J. J. O’Malley; C. Quintana; P. Roushan; D. Sank; A. Vainsencher; J. Wenner; T. C. White; A. N. Cleland; John M. Martinis
errShare
errSave
Tuning Methods for Semiconductor Spin Qubits
err2018-11-09
err41
errOAAI
errBotzem, Tim; Shulman, Michael D.; Foletti, Sandra; Harvey, Shannon P.; Dial, Oliver E.; Bethke, Patrick; Cerfontaine, Pascal; McNeil, Robert P. G.; Mahalu, Diana; Umansky, Vladimir; Ludwig, Arne; Wieck, Andreas; Schuh, Dieter; Bougeard, Dominique; Yacoby, Amir; Bluhm, Hendrik
errShare
errSave
Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices
err2018-04-23
err762
errOAAI
errBoixo, Sergio; Isakov, Sergei, V; Smelyanskiy, Vadim N.; Babbush, Ryan; Ding, Nan; Jiang, Zhang; Bremner, Michael J.; Martinis, John M.; Neven, Hartmut
errShare
errSave
researcher View more