arrow
Return

Optimal Foraging in Semantic Memory

delete2012-01-01
delete288
delete
OA
AI
T
Thomas T. Hills *
M
Michael N. Jones
P
Peter M. Todd
DOI:10.1037/a0027373delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Do humans search in memory using dynamic local-to-global search strategies similar to those that animals use to forage between patches in space? If so, do their dynamic memory search policies correspond to optimal foraging strategies seen for spatial foraging? Results from a number of fields suggest these possibilities, including the shared structure of the search problems-searching in patchy environments-and recent evidence supporting a domain-general cognitive search process. To investigate these questions directly, we asked participants to recover from memory as many animal names as they could in 3 min. Memory search was modeled over a representation of the semantic search space generated from the BEAGLE memory model of Jones and Mewhort (2007), via a search process similar to models of associative memory search (e.g., Raaijmakers & Shiffrin, 1981). We found evidence for local structure (i.e., patches) in memory search and patch depletion preceding dynamic local-to-global transitions between patches. Dynamic models also significantly outperformed nondynamic models. The timing of dynamic local-to-global transitions was consistent with optimal search policies in space, specifically the marginal value theorem (Charnov, 1976), and participants who were more consistent with this policy recalled more items.
Keywords:
optimal foraging
memory search
category fluency
semantic space models
marginal value theorem
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Psychological Review cover
Psychological Review
IF:
5.8
Papers:
1.8K
Citations:
3.2W

Organization

I
indiana university system
Scholars:
4.0W
Papers: 3.5W
Citations: 38
U
University of Warwick
Scholars:
2.2W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 85
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

No cited papers available