arrow
Return

Performance optimisation of deep learning models using majority voting algorithm for brain tumour classification

delete2021-08-01
delete47
PRE
AI
G
Gopal S. Tandel *
A
Ashish Tiwari
O
O. G. Kakde
DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104564delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background: Although biopsy is the gold standard for tumour grading, being invasive, this procedure also proves fatal to the brain. Thus, non-invasive methods for brain tumour grading are urgently needed. Here, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based non-invasive brain tumour grading method has been proposed using deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) techniques. Method: Four clinically applicable datasets were designed. The four datasets were trained and tested on five DLbased models (convolutional neural networks), AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, and ResNet50, and five ML-based models, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbours, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, and Linear Discrimination using five-fold cross-validation. A majority voting (MajVot)-based ensemble algorithm has been proposed to optimise the overall classification performance of five DL and five ML-based models. Results: The average accuracy improvement of four datasets using the DL-based MajVot algorithm against AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, and ResNet50 models was 2.02%, 1.11%, 1.04%, 2.67%, and 1.65%, respectively. Further, a 10.12% improvement was seen in the average accuracy of four datasets using the DL method against ML. Furthermore, the proposed DL-based MajVot algorithm was validated on synthetic face data and improved the male versus female face image classification accuracy by 2.88%, 0.71%, 1.90%, 2.24%, and 0.35% against AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, and ResNet50, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed MajVot algorithm achieved promising results for brain tumour classification and is able to utilise the combined potential of multiple models.
Keywords:
Ensemble
Majority voting
Convolutional neural network
Machine learning
Deep learning
Transfer learning
Magnetic resonance imaging
Computer-aided diagnosis

Journal

Computers in Biology and Medicine cover
Computers in Biology and Medicine
IF:
6.3
Papers:
8.4K
Citations:
3.3W

Organization

N
national institute of technology (nit system)
Scholars:
0
Papers: 1.3K
Citations: 1
V
visvesvaraya national institute of technology, nagpur
Scholars:
723
Papers: 753
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Trp-dependent auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: involvement of cytochrome P450s CYP79B2 and CYP79B3
err2002-12-01
err0
errOAAI
errYunde Zhao; Anna K. Hull; Neeru R. Gupta; Kendrick A. Goss; José Alonso; Joseph R. Ecker; Jennifer Normanly; Joanne Chory; John L. Celenza
errShare
errSave
Symtosis: A liver ultrasound tissue characterization and risk stratification in optimized deep learning paradigm
err2018-03-01
err125
PREAI
errBiswas, Mainak; Kuppili, Venkatanareshbabu; Edla, Damodar Reddy; Suri, Harman S.; Saba, Luca; Marinhoe, Rui Tato; Sanches, J. Miguel; Suri, Jasjit S.
errShare
errSave
Vinpocetine treatment in acute ischaemic stroke: a pilot single‐blind randomized clinical trial
err2001-12-21
err0
errOAAI
errV. L. Feigin; B. M. Doronin; T. F. Popova; E. V. Gribatcheva; D. V. Tchervov
errShare
errSave
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
err2016-05-01
err4.0K
errOAAI
errShin, Hoo-Chang; Roth, Holger R.; Gao, Mingchen; Lu, Le; Xu, Ziyue; Nogues, Isabella; Yao, Jianhua; Mollura, Daniel; Summers, Ronald M.
errShare
errSave
Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?
err2016-05-01
err2.1K
errOAAI
errTajbakhsh, Nima; Shin, Jae Y.; Gurudu, Suryakanth R.; Hurst, R. Todd; Kendall, Christopher B.; Gotway, Michael B.; Liang, Jianming
errShare
errSave
researcher View more