arrow
Return

Physician-led versus questionnaire-based psychosocial screening in adults with high-grade glioma: a cluster-randomized controlled trial (GLIOPT)

delete2025-09-10
delete0
delete
OA
AI
M
Mirjam Renovanz *
M
Melina Hippler
R
Robert Kuchen
L
Lorenz Doerner
D
David Rieger
J
Joachim P. Steinbach
M
Michael Ronellenfitsch
M
Martin Voß
A
Almuth F. Keßler
V
Vera Nickl
M
Martin Misch
J
Julia Onken
M
Marion Rapp
M
Minou Nadji‐Ohl
M
Marcus Mehlitz
J
Jürgen Meixensberger
M
Michael Karl Fehrenbach
N
Naureen Keric
F
Florian Ringel
J
Jan Coburger
C
Carolin Weiß Lucas
J
Jens Wehinger
F
Friederike Schmidt‐Graf
J
Jens Gempt
M
Marcos Tatagiba
G
Ghazaleh Tabatabai
M
Melanie Schranz
S
Susanne Singer
DOI:10.1007/s11060-025-05223-6delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Patients diagnosed with high-grade gliomas (HGG) often experience substantial psychosocial dis-tress. However, due to neurological and neurocognitive deficits its assessment remains challenging, and needs remain unmet. We compared a novel face-to-face assessment during doctor-patient conversations with questionnaire-based screening. In this multicenter, two-arm cluster-randomized study involving 13 centers patients in the interven-tion group (IG) were screened for distress via physician-patient conversations, while the control group (CG) completed the Distress Thermometer. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with poor emotional functioning (measured with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire) who received specialized psychosocial care (PC) within 3 months. Data were collected via patient and physician reports and medical records. Analysis employed mixed models logistic regression. In total, 763 patients were enrolled at baseline, and 506 completed the follow-up. The emotional functioning was poor in 302/506 (59.7%). The frequency of patients reporting PC utilization was comparable between groups (IG 93/168, 55.4% vs. CG 87/134, 64.9%, odds ratio (OR) =0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.40-1.11, p=0.115). Likewise, the provision of information about special-ized psycho-oncological care was similar (IG 112/168, 66.7% vs. CG 94/134, 70.1%, OR=0.95, 95%CI=0.39-2.29, p=0.904). Physician-led, face-to-face distress screening was not superior to questionnaire-based screening in facilitating psychosocial care referrals. Nonetheless, it represents a feasible and patient-centered alternative, particularly for patients with high-grade gliomas suffering from neurocognitive or func-tional deficits.
Keywords:
Distress
Psychosocial burden
Psychosocial care
Supportive care needs
Assessment
Screening
Primary brain tumor patients
High-grade glioma
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

J
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
IF:
3.1
Papers:
8.1K
Citations:
1.5W

Organization

S
Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology
Scholars:
3
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
D
department of neurosurgery
Scholars:
4.1K
Papers: 1.3K
Citations: 1
C
comprehensive cancer center tübingen-stuttgart
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
U
university hospital tübingen
Scholars:
411
Papers: 144
Citations: 1
I
Institute of Medical Biostatistics
Scholars:
25
Papers: 15
Citations: 0
C
Center for Neurosurgery
Scholars:
2
Papers: 3
Citations: 0
D
Department of Neurology
Scholars:
4.5K
Papers: 1.5K
Citations: 8
researcher View more organizations