arrow
Return

Physiological feelings

delete2019-08-01
delete126
delete
OA
AI
E
Edward F. Pace‐Schott *
T
Tatjana Aue
M
Michela Balconi
L
Lauren M. Bylsma
H
Hugo Critchley
H
Heath A. Demaree
B
Bruce H. Friedman
O
Olivia Gosseries
T
Tanja Jovanović
L
Lauren A. J. Kirby
K
Kasia Kozlowska
S
Steven Laureys
L
Leroy Lowe
K
Kelsey Magee
M
Marie‐France Marin
A
Amanda R. Merner
J
Jennifer L. Robinson
R
Robert C. Smith
D
Derek P. Spangler
M
Michael B. VanElzakker
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.05.002delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The role of peripheral physiology in the experience of emotion has been debated since the 19th century following the seminal proposal by William James that somatic responses to stimuli determine subjective emotion. Subsequent views have integrated the forebrain's ability to initiate, represent and simulate such physiological events. Modern affective neuroscience envisions an interacting network of bottom-up and top-down signaling in which the peripheral (PNS) and central nervous systems both receive and generate the experience of emotion. Feelings serves as a term for the perception of these physical changes whether emanating from actual somatic events or from the brain's representation of such. Interoception has come to represent the brain's receipt and representation of these actual and virtual somatic changes that may or may not enter conscious awareness but, nonetheless, influence feelings. Such information can originate from diverse sources including endocrine, immune and gastrointestinal systems as well as the PNS. We here examine physiological feelings from diverse perspectives including current and historical theories, evolution, neuroanatomy and physiology, development, regulatory processes, pathology and linguistics.
Keywords:
Emotion
Feelings
Interoception
Somatic markers
Emotion regulation
Autonomic nervous system
Insula
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

N
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
IF:
7.9
Papers:
6.1K
Citations:
4.5W

Organization

U
University System of Ohio
Scholars:
15.4W
Papers: 13.0W
Citations: 200
C
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Scholars:
3.1W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 22
H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.5W
Papers: 22.0W
Citations: 28.7W
U
University of Liege
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 2.1W
U
University of Sydney
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 6.2W
Citations: 90
U
University of Texas at Tyler
Scholars:
552
Papers: 467
Citations: 0
U
University of Sussex
Scholars:
9.2K
Papers: 9.3K
Citations: 27
C
Case Western Reserve University
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 3.4W
U
University of Pittsburgh
Scholars:
4.5W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 7.1W
P
pennsylvania commonwealth system of higher education (pcshe)
Scholars:
12.9W
Papers: 11.7W
Citations: 177
U
university of texas system
Scholars:
18.5W
Papers: 15.6W
Citations: 210
A
auburn university system
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 9.5K
Citations: 9
U
university of quebec montreal
Scholars:
3.9K
Papers: 3.5K
Citations: 7
U
university of quebec
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.9W
Citations: 19
E
Emory University
Scholars:
5.0W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 5.7W
H
Harvard Medical School
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 4.8W
Citations: 91
U
University of Bern
Scholars:
3.9W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 4.8W
researcher View more organizations