.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Pooling is not the answer
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.014.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This note studies practical and theoretical scenarios to improve a completely pooled or unpooled scenario for two server groups (e.g. call center groups) with short and long jobs (e.g. calls). First, simple overflow (reported earlier) scenarios and priority rules are compared. Next, threshold rules are investigated for further practical improvement. Finally, a threshold rule is sought for a strict improvement over pooling for both short and long jobs. The practical value is illustrated numerically and appears to be consistent also for larger server numbers. The results show: (i) An overall average improvement by prioritizing short jobs. (ii) A slight but strict improvement over pooling by prioritizing long jobs. The first result is of practical interest; the second one is more theoretical. A practical scheme is provided for an ordering of scenarios, up to realistically large numbers of servers as in call centers. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Pooling
Queueing
Overflow
Priority rule
Threshold rule
Journal
IF:
6
Papers:
2.2W
Citations:
6.4W