arrow
Return

Post hoc estimation of a quantitative restriction spectrum imaging biomarker for prostate cancer detection using conventional MRI

delete2026-03-19
delete0
PRE
AI
D
Deondre D. Do
A
Aditya Bagrodia
M
Matthew Cooperberg
M
Mukesh Harisinghani
J
Javier-desloges, Juan
S
Sophia C. Kamran
C
Christopher J. Kane
L
Lee, Kang-Lung
L
Liss, Michael A.
D
Daniel J. A. Margolis
N
Nakrour, Nabih
O
Ohliger, Michael A.
T
Thomas Osinski
R
Rakow-penner, Rebecca
S
Salmasi, Amirali
S
Shabaik, Ahmed S.
Y
Yuze Song
T
Trecarten, Shaun
W
Weinberg, Eric P.
S
Sean Woolen
A
Anders M. Dale
T
T. M. Seibert
DOI:10.1002/acm2.70543delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background: Multiparametric MRI is useful for early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), but its standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has limited utility as a quantitative metric for automated, patient-level detection of csPCa. Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), an advanced diffusion technique, yields a quantitative biomarker (RSIrs) that improves csPCa detection. RSIrs is typically calculated from a dedicated multi-b-value acquisition. RSIrs estimated from conventional MRI has not been studied. Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and validity of RSI metrics estimated post hoc from conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to serve as a viable surrogate for a dedicated RSI acquisition. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with both a dedicated RSI acquisition and conventional DWI. We compared three different RSI restriction score (RSIrs) calculation methods: from the dedicated acquisition (RSIrs(dedicated)), from conventional DWI alone (RSIrs(post-hoc)), and from a combination of conventional DWI with only the high b-values from the RSI acquisition (RSIrs(combo)). We compared these methods for quantitative agreement and csPCa detection performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUC, 95% confidence interval]) of maximum RSIrs (RSIrs(max)) in the prostate compared to that of minimum ADC (ADC). Results: Data from n = 1095 patients (16 centers) were analyzed. Post hoc RSIrs(max) differed systematically from RSIrs(dedicated) by a median of +156 (RSIrs(post-hoc)) and -59 (RSIrs(combo)), respectively. AUCs for csPCa detection were 0.51 [0.47,0.54], 0.60 [0.57,0.64], 0.70 [0.67,0.74], and 0.77 [0.74,0.80] for ADC, RSIrs(post-hoc), RSIrs(combo), and RSIrs(dedicated), respectively. Conclusion: Even when estimated using conventional DWI, RSIrs is a superior quantitative biomarker to ADC for automated, patient-level detection of csPCa. A dedicated RSI acquisition gives the best performance. A compromise would be to acquire high b-values (1500 and 2500 s/mm(2)) to complement low b-values (<1000 s/mm(2)) from conventional DWI.
Keywords:
diffusion weighted imaging
prostate cancer
radiation therapy
restriction spectrum imaging

Journal

J
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
IF:
2.2
Papers:
286
Citations:
6.1K

Organization

U
university of california san francisco
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 67
M
massachusetts general hospital
Scholars:
3.2K
Papers: 1.5K
Citations: 0
H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.2W
Papers: 21.9W
Citations: 28.7W
H
harvard university medical affiliates
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 4.5W
Citations: 36
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
U
university of california san diego
Scholars:
4.7K
Papers: 2.1K
Citations: 1
researcher View more organizations