arrow
Return

Predicting bacterial promoter function and evolution from random sequences

delete2022-01-26
delete19
delete
OA
AI
M
Mato Lagator *
S
Srdjan Sarikas
M
Magdalena Steinrueck
D
David Toledo-Aparicio
J
Jonathan P. Bollback
C
Călin C. Guet
G
Gašper Tkačik
DOI:10.7554/eLife.64543delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Predicting function from sequence is a central problem of biology. Currently, this is possible only locally in a narrow mutational neighborhood around a wildtype sequence rather than globally from any sequence. Using random mutant libraries, we developed a biophysical model that accounts for multiple features of sigma(70) binding bacterial promoters to predict constitutive gene expression levels from any sequence. We experimentally and theoretically estimated that 10-20% of random sequences lead to expression and similar to 80% of non-expressing sequences are one mutation away from a functional promoter. The potential for generating expression from random sequences is so pervasive that selection acts against sigma(70)-RNA polymerase binding sites even within intergenic, promoter-containing regions. This pervasiveness of sigma(70)-binding sites implies that emergence of promoters is not the limiting step in gene regulatory evolution. Ultimately, the inclusion of novel features of promoter function into a mechanistic model enabled not only more accurate predictions of gene expression levels, but also identified that promoters evolve more rapidly than previously thought.
Keywords:
TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION
ESCHERICHIA-COLI
GENE-EXPRESSION
BINDING
MECHANISMS
NUMBERS
FITNESS
PROTEIN
MODEL
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

eLife cover
eLife
IF:
0
Papers:
1.8W
Citations:
16

Organization

I
institute of science & technology - austria
Scholars:
1.5K
Papers: 1.2K
Citations: 2
U
University of Liverpool
Scholars:
2.8W
Papers: 2.5W
Citations: 3.5W
U
University of Manchester
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 5.2W
Citations: 7.4W
researcher View more organizations