arrow
Return

Predicting performance of object detection models in electron microscopy using random forests

delete2025-03-01
delete0
delete
OA
AI
N
Ni Li
R
Ryan Jacobs
M
Matthew Lynch
V
Vidit Agrawal
K
Kevin G. Field
D
Dane Morgan *
DOI:10.1039/d4dd00351adelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Quantifying prediction uncertainty when applying object detection models to new, unlabeled datasets is critical in applied machine learning. This study introduces an approach to estimate the performance of deep learning-based object detection models for quantifying defects in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, focusing on detecting irradiation-induced cavities in TEM images of metal alloys. We developed a random forest regression model that predicts the object detection F1 score, a statistical metric used to evaluate the ability to accurately locate and classify objects of interest. The random forest model uses features extracted from the predictions of the object detection model whose uncertainty is being quantified, enabling fast prediction on new, unlabeled images. The mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting F1 of the trained model on test data is 0.09, and the R2 score is 0.77, indicating there is a significant correlation between the random forest regression model predicted and true defect detection F1 scores. The approach is shown to be robust across three distinct TEM image datasets with varying imaging and material domains. Our approach enables users to estimate the reliability of a defect detection and segmentation model predictions and assess the applicability of the model to their specific datasets, providing valuable information about possible domain shifts and whether the model needs to be fine-tuned or trained on additional data to be maximally effective for the desired use case.

Journal

Digital Discovery cover
Digital Discovery
IF:
5.6
Papers:
981
Citations:
1.7K

Organization

U
university of wisconsin madison
Scholars:
3.8W
Papers: 2.9W
Citations: 53
University of Wisconsin System cover
University of Wisconsin System
Scholars:
6.7W
Papers: 5.8W
Citations: 382
U
university of michigan system
Scholars:
9.1W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 133
researcher View more organizations