arrow
Return

Preparing Patients for Oral Immunotherapy (PPOINT): International Delphi consensus for procedural preparation and consent

delete2024-06-01
delete8
delete
OA
AI
D
Douglas P. Mack *
T
Timothy E. Dribin
P
Paul Turner
R
Richard L. Wasserman
M
Mariam Hanna
M
Marcus Shaker
M
Mimi L.K. Tang
P
Pablo Rodríguez del Río
B
Brad Sobolewski
E
Elissa M. Abrams
A
Aikaterini Anagnostou
S
Stefania Arasi
S
Sakina Bajowala
P
Philippe Bégin
S
Scott B. Cameron
E
Edmond S. Chan
R
R. Sharon Chinthrajah
A
Andrew Clark
P
Paul Detjen
G
George Du Toit
M
Motohiro Ebisawa
A
Arnon Elizur
J
Jeffrey M. Factor
J
Justin Greiwe
J
Jonathan O’B Hourihane
S
Sarah W. Hughes
D
Douglas H. Jones
A
Antonella Muraro
A
Anna Nowak‐Węgrzyn
N
Nandinee Patel
A
Amy M. Scurlock
A
Atul N. Shah
S
Sayantani Sindher
S
Stephen A. Tilles
B
Brian P. Vickery
J
Julie Wang
H
Hugh H. Windom
M
Matthew Greenhawt
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2024.02.019delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background: Despite the promise of oral immunotherapy (OIT) to treat food allergies, this procedure is associated with potential risk. There is no current agreement about what elements should be included in the preparatory or consent process. Objective: We developed consensus recommendations about the OIT process considerations and patient-specific factors that should be addressed before initiating OIT and developed a consensus OIT consent process and information form. Methods: We convened a 36-member Preparing Patients for Oral Immunotherapy (PPOINT) panel of allergy experts to develop a consensus OIT patient preparation, informed consent process, and framework form. Consensus for themes and statements was reached using Delphi methodology, and the consent information form was developed. Results: The expert panel reached consensus for 4 themes and 103 statements specific to OIT preparatory procedures, of which 76 statements reached consensus for inclusion specific to the following themes: general considerations for counseling patients about OIT; patient- and family -specific factors that should be addressed before initiating OIT and during OIT; indications for initiating OIT; and potential contraindications and precautions for OIT. The panel reached consensus on 9 OIT consent form themes: benefits, risks, outcomes, alternatives, risk mitigation, difficulties/challenges, discontinuation, office policies, and longterm management. From these themes, 219 statements were proposed, of which 189 reached consensus, and 71 were included on the consent information form. Conclusion: We developed consensus recommendations to prepare and counsel patients for safe and effective OIT in clinical practice with evidence -based risk mitigation. Adoption of these recommendations may help standardize clinical care and improve patient outcomes and quality of life. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2024;153:1621-33.)
Keywords:
Allergy
anaphylaxis
Delphi
food allergy
oral immu- notherapy
consent
patient preparation
shared decision making
risk mitigation
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology cover
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IF:
11.2
Papers:
3.7W
Citations:
5.6W

Organization

M
Medical City Dallas Hospital
Scholars:
218
Papers: 186
Citations: 113
S
shamir medical center (assaf harofeh)
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 874
Citations: 0
I
irccs bambino gesu
Scholars:
9.8K
Papers: 5.3K
Citations: 5
U
University System of Ohio
Scholars:
15.2W
Papers: 12.9W
Citations: 200
U
University of Cincinnati
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 2.2W
B
bernstein allergy group
Scholars:
28
Papers: 42
Citations: 0
B
bc children's hospital
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 990
Citations: 0
A
azienda ospedaliera - universita di padova
Scholars:
4.5K
Papers: 3.4K
Citations: 5
U
universite de montreal
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 46
U
University of Padua
Scholars:
5.1W
Papers: 4.3W
Citations: 57
U
University of Manitoba
Scholars:
1.9W
Papers: 1.7W
Citations: 18
U
University of Washington
Scholars:
8.0W
Papers: 7.0W
Citations: 12.5W
S
Stanford University
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.2W
Citations: 17.0W
C
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Scholars:
2.0K
Papers: 1.4K
Citations: 3.3K
R
royal college of surgeons - ireland
Scholars:
6.8K
Papers: 5.0K
Citations: 6
B
Baylor College of Medicine
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.0W
Citations: 4.2W
U
University of Arkansas System
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 295
U
university of london
Scholars:
21.3W
Papers: 19.6W
Citations: 305
U
university of warmia & mazury
Scholars:
3.8K
Papers: 3.4K
Citations: 1
E
Emory University
Scholars:
5.0W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 5.7W
B
baylor college medical hospital
Scholars:
6.5K
Papers: 4.7K
Citations: 7
D
Dartmouth College
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 1.8W
M
McMaster University
Scholars:
3.6W
Papers: 3.3W
Citations: 4.4W
T
Tel Aviv University
Scholars:
3.7W
Papers: 3.0W
Citations: 3.6W
I
Imperial College London
Scholars:
8.3W
Papers: 7.3W
Citations: 11.1W
U
University of British Columbia
Scholars:
6.9W
Papers: 6.1W
Citations: 8.6W
researcher View more organizations