1
Return

Priorities for breast cancer risk assessment in UK women under age 50: a survey and discrete choice experiment

delete2026-08-04
delete0
delete
OA
AI
R
Rebecca A. Dennison
M
Maria Valasaki
S
Stuart Wright
R
Reuben Frost
S
Sacha J. Howell
A
Antonis C. Antoniou
D
Douglas F. Easton
S
Stephen Morris
M
Montserrat García‐Closas
V
Victoria G. Woof
D
David French
J
Juliet A. Usher‐Smith *
DOI:10.1038/s41416-026-03546-3delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
National guidelines recommend English women between 30 and 49 years with moderate/high risk of breast cancer (BC) be offered screening and prevention interventions. Identification  largely relies on family history-based criteria amongst women self-presenting in primary care. We aimed to understand the preference for different potential risk assessment strategies in this population. A cross-sectional survey including a discrete choice experiment. Risk assessments were defined using six attributes, including initiation strategy, eligibility for a full/detailed risk assessment, components of the risk assessment, including multifactorial risk assessment based on the BOADICEA/CanRisk model, and sensitivity. Coefficients from conditional logistic regression were used to estimate preference for different risk assessment approaches compared to current care. Participants (n = 893) preferred alternative approaches for risk assessments over current care, particularly where all eligible women were proactively invited and more above-average risk women were correctly identified. All but one of 21 risk assessment approaches was preferred, with the most favoured approaches having a probability of being preferred over current care >92%. Education level and ethnicity potentially impacted the strength of participant priorities. Offering multifactorial BC risk assessments to younger women in primary care, especially the most proactive and broad approaches, would be acceptable and preferred over current practice.
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

British Journal of Cancer cover
British Journal of Cancer
IF:
6.8
Papers:
1.7W
Citations:
5.0W

Organization

D
department of public health and primary care
Scholars:
201
Papers: 83
Citations: 0
M
manchester centre for health psychology
Scholars:
5
Papers: 2
Citations: 0
T
The Institute of Cancer Research
Scholars:
438
Papers: 132
Citations: 1
F
Faculty of Biology
Scholars:
799
Papers: 342
Citations: 2
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers