.png){kind=icon}
Return
Process guidelines for establishing Intercoder Reliability in qualitative studies
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1177/1468794115577012.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Qualitative interviews are increasingly being utilized within the context of intervention trials. While there is emerging assistance for conducting and reporting qualitative analysis, there are limited practical resources available for researchers engaging in a group coding process and interested in ensuring adequate Intercoder Reliability (ICR); the amount of agreement between two or more coders for the codes applied to qualitative text. Assessing the reliability of the coding helps establish the credibility of qualitative findings. We discuss our experience calculating ICR in the context of a behavioural HIV prevention trial for young women in South Africa which involves multiple rounds of longitudinal qualitative data collection. We document the steps that we took to improve ICR in this study, the challenges to improving ICR, and the value of the process to qualitative data analysis. As a result, we provide guidelines for other researchers to consider as they embark on large qualitative projects.
Keywords:
coding
qualitative
qualitative analysis
reliability
research
software
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
2.9
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
6.1K
Organization
View more organizations
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSaveSilica nanoparticle monolayers on a macroion modified surface: formation mechanism and stability
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more