arrow
Return

Protocol for the development of guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses

delete2023-08-02
delete2
delete
OA
AI
P
Peter Tugwell
V
Vivian Welch
O
Olivia Magwood
A
Alex Todhunter‐Brown
E
Elie A. Akl
T
Thomas W. Concannon
J
Joanne Khabsa
R
Richard Morley
H
Holger J. Schünemann
L
Lyubov Lytvyn
A
Arnav Agarwal
A
Alba Antequera
M
Marc T. Avey
P
Pauline Campbell
C
Christine Chang
S
Stephanie Chang
L
Leonila F. Dans
O
Omar Dewidar
D
Davina Ghersi
I
Ian D. Graham
G
Glen Hazlewood
J
Jennifer Hilgart
T
Tanya Horsley
D
Denny John
J
Janet Jull
L
Lara Maxwell
C
Chris McCutcheon
Z
Zachary Munn
F
Francesco Nonino
J
Jordi Pardo Pardo
R
Roses Parker
K
Kevin Pottie
G
Gabriel Rada
A
Alison Riddle
A
Anneliese Synnot
E
Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu
E
E. Tomlinson
K
Karine Toupin‐April
J
Jennifer Petkovic *
DOI:10.1186/s13643-023-02279-1delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
BackgroundInvolving collaborators and partners in research may increase relevance and uptake, while reducing health and social inequities. Collaborators and partners include people and groups interested in health research: health care providers, patients and caregivers, payers of health research, payers of health services, publishers, policymakers, researchers, product makers, program managers, and the public. Evidence syntheses inform decisions about health care services, treatments, and practice, which ultimately affect health outcomes.Our objectives are to:A. Identify, map, and synthesize qualitative and quantitative findings related to engagement in evidence synthesesB. Explore how engagement in evidence synthesis promotes health equityC. Develop equity-oriented guidance on methods for conducting, evaluating, and reporting engagement in evidence synthesesMethodsOur diverse, international team will develop guidance for engagement with collaborators and partners throughout multiple sequential steps using an integrated knowledge translation approach:1. Reviews. We will co-produce 1 scoping review, 3 systematic reviews and 1 evidence map focusing on (a) methods, (b) barriers and facilitators, (c) conflict of interest considerations, (d) impacts, and (e) equity considerations of engagement in evidence synthesis.2. Methods study, interviews, and survey. We will contextualise the findings of step 1 by assessing a sample of evidence syntheses reporting on engagement with collaborators and partners and through conducting interviews with collaborators and partners who have been involved in producing evidence syntheses. We will use these findings to develop draft guidance checklists and will assess agreement with each item through an international survey.3. Consensus. The guidance checklists will be co-produced and finalised at a consensus meeting with collaborators and partners.4. Dissemination. We will develop a dissemination plan with our collaborators and partners and work collaboratively to improve adoption of our guidance by key organizations.ConclusionOur international team will develop guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses. Incorporating partnership values and expectations may result in better uptake, potentially reducing health inequities.
Keywords:
Systematic reviews
Stakeholder
Engagement
Evidence synthesis
Coproduction

Journal

Systematic Reviews cover
Systematic Reviews
IF:
3.9
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
1.8W

Organization

A
agency for healthcare research & quality
Scholars:
459
Papers: 586
Citations: 1
I
ISGlobal
Scholars:
3.4K
Papers: 2.2K
Citations: 3
U
University of the Philippines Manila
Scholars:
1.3K
Papers: 976
Citations: 1.1K
Q
queens university - canada
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 29
U
University of Calgary
Scholars:
3.8W
Papers: 3.3W
Citations: 52
W
western university (university of western ontario)
Scholars:
2.9W
Papers: 2.7W
Citations: 33
U
University of Adelaide
Scholars:
2.3W
Papers: 2.4W
Citations: 4.2W
O
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Scholars:
7.3K
Papers: 4.6K
Citations: 9
T
tufts university
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 24
O
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Scholars:
6.5K
Papers: 5.2K
Citations: 1.3W
P
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 16
U
University of Sydney
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 6.2W
Citations: 90
University of the Philippines System cover
University of the Philippines System
Scholars:
6.0K
Papers: 3.7K
Citations: 230
A
American University of Beirut
Scholars:
8.3K
Papers: 6.0K
Citations: 1.1W
M
McMaster University
Scholars:
3.6W
Papers: 3.3W
Citations: 4.4W
L
La Trobe University
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 1.5W
H
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 26
U
University of Ottawa
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 3.8W
G
Glasgow Caledonian University
Scholars:
2.4K
Papers: 2.5K
Citations: 2.1K
researcher View more organizations