arrow
Return

Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation

delete2020-02-01
delete120
delete
OA
AI
J
Jennifer Petkovic *
A
Alison Riddle
E
Elie A. Akl
J
Joanne Khabsa
L
Lyubov Lytvyn
P
Pauline Campbell
K
Kalipso Chalkidou
S
Stephanie Chang
S
Sally Crowe
L
Leonila F. Dans
F
Fadi El‐Jardali
D
Davina Ghersi
I
Ian D. Graham
S
Sean Grant
J
Jeanne‐Marie Guise
G
Glen Hazlewood
J
Janet Jull
S
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
É
Étienne V Langlois
A
Anne Lyddiatt
L
Lara Maxwell
R
Richard Morley
R
Reem A. Mustafa
F
Francesco Nonino
J
Jordi Pardo Pardo
K
Kevin Pottie
J
John J. Riva
H
Holger J. Schünemann
R
Rosiane Simeon
M
Maureen Smith
A
Aírton Tetelbom Stein
A
Anneliese Synnot
J
Janice Tufte
H
Howard White
V
Vivian Welch
T
Thomas W. Concannon
P
Peter Tugwell
DOI:10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background Stakeholder engagement has become widely accepted as a necessary component of guideline development and implementation. While frameworks for developing guidelines express the need for those potentially affected by guideline recommendations to be involved in their development, there is a lack of consensus on how this should be done in practice. Further, there is a lack of guidance on how to equitably and meaningfully engage multiple stakeholders. We aim to develop guidance for the meaningful and equitable engagement of multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation. Methods This will be a multi-stage project. The first stage is to conduct a series of four systematic reviews. These will (1) describe existing guidance and methods for stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (2) characterize barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (3) explore the impact of stakeholder engagement on guideline development and implementation, and (4) identify issues related to conflicts of interest when engaging multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation. Discussion We will collaborate with our multiple and diverse stakeholders to develop guidance for multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation. We will use the results of the systematic reviews to develop a candidate list of draft guidance recommendations and will seek broad feedback on the draft guidance via an online survey of guideline developers and external stakeholders. An invited group of representatives from all stakeholder groups will discuss the results of the survey at a consensus meeting which will inform the development of the final guidance papers. Our overall goal is to improve the development of guidelines through meaningful and equitable multi-stakeholder engagement, and subsequently to improve health outcomes and reduce inequities in health.
Keywords:
Guidelines
Stakeholder engagement
Coproduction
Systematic reviews
Guidance
Equity
Integrated knowledge translation
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Systematic Reviews cover
Systematic Reviews
IF:
3.9
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
1.8W

Organization

A
agency for healthcare research & quality
Scholars:
459
Papers: 586
Citations: 1
M
MRC and CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
Scholars:
842
Papers: 845
Citations: 1.3K
U
University of the Philippines Manila
Scholars:
1.3K
Papers: 976
Citations: 1.1K
Q
queens university - canada
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 29
I
indiana university system
Scholars:
3.9W
Papers: 3.5W
Citations: 38
U
University of Calgary
Scholars:
3.8W
Papers: 3.3W
Citations: 52
M
Monash University
Scholars:
5.4W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 79
I
Indiana University Indianapolis
Scholars:
7.3K
Papers: 5.4K
Citations: 473
W
world health organization
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 20
T
tufts university
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 24
O
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Scholars:
6.5K
Papers: 5.2K
Citations: 1.3W
U
university of kansas medical center
Scholars:
6.5K
Papers: 5.0K
Citations: 6
U
University of Kansas
Scholars:
1.9W
Papers: 1.7W
Citations: 8.1K
U
university of glasgow
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 37
University of the Philippines System cover
University of the Philippines System
Scholars:
6.0K
Papers: 3.7K
Citations: 230
A
American University of Beirut
Scholars:
8.3K
Papers: 6.0K
Citations: 1.1W
M
McMaster University
Scholars:
3.6W
Papers: 3.3W
Citations: 4.4W
L
La Trobe University
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 1.5W
U
University of Ottawa
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 3.8W
I
Imperial College London
Scholars:
8.3W
Papers: 7.3W
Citations: 11.1W
G
Glasgow Caledonian University
Scholars:
2.4K
Papers: 2.5K
Citations: 2.1K
D
Deakin University
Scholars:
1.9W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 2.8W
researcher View more organizations