arrow
Return

Pull Request Decisions Explained: An Empirical Overview

delete2023-02-01
delete13
delete
OA
AI
X
Xunhui Zhang
余月 cover
余月 (Yue Yu) *
G
Georgios Gousios
A
Ayushi Rastogi
DOI:10.1109/TSE.2022.3165056delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Context: The pull-based development model is widely used in open source projects, leading to the emergence of trends in distributed software development. One aspect that has garnered significant attention concerning pull request decisions is the identification of explanatory factors. Objective: This study builds on a decade of research on pull request decisions and provides further insights. We empirically investigate how factors influence pull request decisions and the scenarios that change the influence of such factors. Method: We identify factors influencing pull request decisions on GitHub through a systematic literature review and infer them by mining archival data. We collect a total of 3,347,937 pull requests with 95 features from 11,230 diverse projects on GitHub. Using these data, we explore the relations among the factors and build mixed effects logistic regression models to empirically explain pull request decisions. Results: Our study shows that a small number of factors explain pull request decisions, with that concerning whether the integrator is the same as or different from the submitter being the most important factor. We also note that the influence of factors on pull request decisions change with a change in context; e.g., the area hotness of pull request is important only in the early stage of project development, however it becomes unimportant for pull request decisions as projects become mature.
Keywords:
Pull-based development
pull request decision
distributed software development
GitHub

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering cover
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IF:
5.6
Papers:
2.9K
Citations:
1.1W

Organization

D
Delft University of Technology
Scholars:
2.6W
Papers: 2.5W
Citations: 3.8W
U
University of Groningen
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 4.3W
Citations: 5.9W
N
national university of defense technology - china
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 9
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Histologic analyses on the response of the skin to 1,927-nm fractional thulium fiber laser treatment
err2017-09-20
err0
PREAI
errIn Ho Kwon; Youin Bae; Un-Cheol Yeo; Jin Yong Lee; Hyuck Hoon Kwon; Young Hee Choi; Gyeong-Hun Park
errShare
errSave
Artificial Urinary Sphincters around Intestinal Segments—Are they Safe?
err2008-11-26
err0
PREAI
errP. M. T. WESTON; J. D. T. MORGAN; J. HUSSAIN; T. P. STEPHENSON
errShare
errSave
Randomized Comparison of Nifedipine and Placebo in Fibronectin-Negative Women with Symptoms of Preterm Labor and a Short Cervix (APOSTEL-I Trial)
err2014-12-08
err0
errOAAI
errGert-Jan van Baaren; Femke Wilms; Martijn Oudijk; Anneke Kwee; Martina Porath; Hubertina Scheepers; Marc Spaanderman; Kitty Bloemenkamp; Jan van Lith; Antoinette Bolte; Caroline Bax; Jérôme Cornette; Johannes Duvekot; Sebastiaan Nij Bijvank; Jim van Eyck; Maureen Franssen; Krystyna Sollie; Mallory Woiski; Frank Vandenbussche; Joris van der Post; Patrick Bossuyt; Brent Opmeer; Ben Mol; Jolande Vis
errShare
errSave
Bony abnormalities in classic bladder exstrophy: The urologist’s perspective
err2013-04-01
err0
PREAI
errKristina D. Suson; Paul D. Sponseller; John P. Gearhart
errShare
errSave
Gender differences and bias in open source: pull request acceptance of women versus men
err2017-05-01
err183
errOAAI
errTerrell, Josh; Kofink, Andrew; Middleton, Justin; Rainear, Clarissa; Murphy-Hill, Emerson; Parnin, Chris; Stallings, Jon
errShare
errSave
Soft-Tissue Expansion in Lower Extremity Reconstruction
err1991-07-01
err0
PREAI
errPedro T. Borges Filho; Rogerio Izar Neves; Rolf Gemperli; Susan Kaweski; Stephen H. Kahler; Dennis R. Banducci; Ernest K. Manders
errShare
errSave
researcher View more