.png){kind=icon}
Return
Purity is still a problem
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X23000286.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Our recent review demonstrates that purity is a messy construct with at least nine popular scientific understandings. Cultural beliefs about self-control help unify some of these understandings, but much messiness remains. The harm-centric theory of dyadic morality suggests that purity violations can be comprehensively understood as abstract harms, acts perceived by some people (and not others) to indirectly cause suffering.
Keywords:
LIBERALS
Journal
IF:
13.7
Papers:
1.6W
Citations:
1.2W
Organization
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveThe Myth of Harmless Wrongs in Moral Cognition: Automatic Dyadic Completion From Sin to Suffering
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave no more
no more