arrow
Return

QAOA-Driven PMU placement optimization with graph learning-based parameter initialization refinement

delete2026-03-16
delete0
delete
OA
AI
姜
姜雨琪 (Yuqi Jiang)
X
Xiangyue Wang
Z
Zhiding Liang
Y
Yan Li *
T
Thomas Morstyn
P
Pedro L. S. Lopes
M
Matthew J. Brandsema
DOI:10.1007/s42484-026-00354-zdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
With the significant expansion of renewable energy integration, the scale of the power grid also increases rapidly. To effectively monitor the operational state of large-scale power grids, optimizing the placement of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) is a critical research focus. Optimizing PMU Placement (OPP) is a typical combinatorial optimization problem with NP-hard complexity, which brings substantial challenges to classical computers. The sheer scale of modern grids forces classical solvers into prohibitive runtimes and sub-optimal local minima, degrading both execution speed and solution quality. Recent advances in quantum computing have opened new opportunities for tackling combinatorial optimization problems, particularly through the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). However, QAOA operates as a hybrid quantum–classical framework, where determining the optimal parameters depends on a classical optimization process that remains computationally challenging and inherently NP-hard. On the other hand, in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, obtaining optimal optimization results typically requires a large number of quantum measurement shots. In this work, we propose a graph-learning-based strategy to provide QAOA with guided parameter initialization, enabling effective operation under limited quantum resources, particularly when the number of available measurement shots is restricted. Both the OPP problem and the channel-limitation task are investigated, where the proposed graph-learning-based parameter predictor enhances QAOA performance on both tasks, improving both the approximation ratio and computational efficiency. Furthermore, due to the complexity of the channel-limitation task and the scarcity of its pretraining data, a transfer learning strategy is employed to leverage knowledge from the original OPP task, where QAOA parameter datasets are more readily available to train the graph learning framework for the QAOA parameter predictor. The transfer learning approach also outperforms both random initialization and graph learning trained solely on the channel-limitation dataset in terms of the approximation ratio and the time efficiency. In general, this work is aimed at providing a new benchmark for solving complicated real-world power system optimization problems in the current NISQ era.
Keywords:
Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA)
Power system optimization
Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU)

Journal

Q
Quantum Machine Intelligence
IF:
4.4
Papers:
451
Citations:
796

Organization

E
engineering science
Scholars:
53
Papers: 32
Citations: 0
C
computer science
Scholars:
1.5K
Papers: 737
Citations: 0
P
Pennsylvania State University
Scholars:
3.0W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 7.2W
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Optimal PMU Placement via Quantum Optimization
err2025-07-01
err0
PREAI
errYuqi Jiang; Zhiding Liang; Yan Li; Thomas Morstyn
errShare
errSave
Optimal PMU Placement Considering Controlled Islanding of Power System
err2014-03-01
err137
PREAI
errHuang, Lei; Sun, Yuanzhang; Xu, Jian; Gao, Wenzhong; Zhang, Jun; Wu, Ziping
errShare
errSave
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
err2019-10-23
err0
errOAAI
errFrank Arute; Kunal Arya; Ryan Babbush; Dave Bacon; Joseph C. Bardin; Rami Barends; Rupak Biswas; Sergio Boixo; Fernando G. S. L. Brandao; David A. Buell; Brian Burkett; Yu Chen; Zijun Chen; Ben Chiaro; Roberto Collins; William Courtney; Andrew Dunsworth; Edward Farhi; Brooks Foxen; Austin Fowler; Craig Gidney; Marissa Giustina; Rob Graff; Keith Guerin; Steve Habegger; Matthew P. Harrigan; Michael J. Hartmann; Alan Ho; Markus Hoffmann; Trent Huang; Travis S. Humble; Sergei V. Isakov; Evan Jeffrey; Zhang Jiang; Dvir Kafri; Kostyantyn Kechedzhi; Julian Kelly; Paul V. Klimov; Sergey Knysh; Alexander Korotkov; Fedor Kostritsa; David Landhuis; Mike Lindmark; Erik Lucero; Dmitry Lyakh; Salvatore Mandrà; Jarrod R. McClean; Matthew McEwen; Anthony Megrant; Xiao Mi; Kristel Michielsen; Masoud Mohseni; Josh Mutus; Ofer Naaman; Matthew Neeley; Charles Neill; Murphy Yuezhen Niu; Eric Ostby; Andre Petukhov; John C. Platt; Chris Quintana; Eleanor G. Rieffel; Pedram Roushan; Nicholas C. Rubin; Daniel Sank; Kevin J. Satzinger; Vadim Smelyanskiy; Kevin J. Sung; Matthew D. Trevithick; Amit Vainsencher; Benjamin Villalonga; Theodore White; Z. Jamie Yao; Ping Yeh; Adam Zalcman; Hartmut Neven; John M. Martinis
errShare
errSave
Benchmarking the performance of portfolio optimization with QAOA
err2022-12-16
err0
errOAAI
errSebastian Brandhofer; Daniel Braun; Vanessa Dehn; Gerhard Hellstern; Matthias Hüls; Yanjun Ji; Ilia Polian; Amandeep Singh Bhatia; Thomas Wellens
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
A modified optimal PMU placement problem formulation considering channel limits under various contingencies
err2019-03-01
err28
PREAI
errShafiullah, Md; Hossain, Md Ismail; Abido, M. A.; Abdel-Fattah, Taher; Mantawy, A. H.
errShare
errSave
no more