arrow
Return

Quality evaluation for Model-Driven Web Engineering methodologies

delete2012-11-01
delete24
delete
OA
AI
F
Francisco José Domínguez Mayo *
M
María José Escalona
M
M. Mejías
M
Margaret Ross
DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.06.007delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Context: There are lots of approaches or methodologies in the Model-Driven Web Engineering (MDWE) context to develop Web Applications without reaching a consensus on the use of standards and scarcity of both, practical experience and tool support. Objective: Model-Driven Web Engineering (MDWE) methodologies are constantly evolving. Moreover, Quality is a very important factor to identify within a methodology as it defines processes, techniques and artifacts to develop Web Applications. For this reason, when analyzing a methodology, it is not only necessary to evaluate quality, but also to find out how to improve it. The main goal of this paper is to develop a set of Quality Characteristics and Sub-Characteristics for MDWE approaches based on ISO/IEC standards. Method: From the software products context, some widely standards proposed, such as ISO/IEC 9126 or ISO/IEC 25000, suggest a Quality Model for software products, although up to now, there are no standard methods to assess quality on MDWE methodologies. Such methodologies can be organized into Properties, thus, a methodology has artifacts, processes and techniques. Then, each item is evaluated through a set of appropriate Quality Characteristics, depending on its nature. This paper proposes to evaluate a methodology as a product itself. Results: This paper recommends a set of Quality Characteristics and Sub-Characteristics based on these standards in order to evaluate MDWE methodologies quality. Additionally, it defines an agile way to relate these Quality Sub-Characteristics to Properties with the sole purpose of not only analyzing, but also assessing and improving MDWE methodologies. Conclusions: The application of these Quality Characteristics and Sub-Characteristics could promote efficiency in methodologies since this kind of assessment enhances both the understanding of strengths and weaknesses of approaches. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Software engineering
Standards
Metrics/measurement
Methodologies
Quality analysis and evaluation
Software quality/SQA
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Information and Software Technology cover
Information and Software Technology
IF:
4.3
Papers:
3.8K
Citations:
7.7K

Organization

S
solent university
Scholars:
566
Papers: 677
Citations: 0
U
University of Sevilla
Scholars:
1.9W
Papers: 1.7W
Citations: 15
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

A quality management based on the Quality Model life cycle
err2012-06-01
err21
errOAAI
errDominguez-Mayo, F. J.; Escalona, M. J.; Mejias, M.; Ross, M.; Staples, G.
errShare
errSave
Experiments on Active Drag Reduction on a Complex Outer Wing Model
err2015-07-01
err0
PREAI
errMatthias Bauer; Thomas Grund; Wolfgang Nitsche
errShare
errSave
Copper Contamination in the Sediments of Salt River Mouth, Taiwan
err2012-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errChiu-Wen Chen; Chih-Feng Chen; Cheng-Di Dong
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Infant Acceptance of a Bitter-Tasting Liquid Medication: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Rx Medibottle With an Oral Syringe
err2009-02-02
err0
PREAI
errMurli U. Purswani; Jolly Radhakrishnan; Khudsia R. Irfan; Cynthia Walter-Glickman; Stefan Hagmann; Richard Neugebauer
errShare
errSave
no more