Quantifying individual risk for binary outcomes

doi:10.1093/jrsssb/qkag071

Quantifying individual risk for binary outcomes

2026-05-19

0

PRE

AI

DOI：10.1093/jrsssb/qkag071

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

Understanding treatment effect heterogeneity is crucial for reliable decision-making in treatment evaluation and selection. The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is widely used to capture treatment effect heterogeneity induced by observed covariates and to design individualized treatment policies. However, it is an average metric within subpopulations, which prevents it from revealing individual risk, potentially leading to misleading results. This article fills this gap by examining individual risk for binary outcomes, specifically focusing on the fraction negatively affected (FNA), a metric that quantifies the percentage of individuals experiencing worse outcomes under treatment compared with control. Even under the strong ignorability assumption, FNA is still unidentifiable, and the existing Fréchet–Hoeffding bounds are often too wide and attainable only under extreme data-generating processes. By invoking mild conditions on the value range of the Pearson correlation coefficient between potential outcomes, we obtain improved bounds compared with the Fréchet–Hoeffding bounds. Additionally, we establish a nonparametric sensitivity analysis framework for FNA using the Pearson correlation coefficient as the sensitivity parameter. Furthermore, we propose nonparametric estimators for the refined FNA bounds and prove their consistency and asymptotic normality.

Keywords:

individual risk

binary outcomes

treatment effect heterogeneity

conditional average treatment effect

sensitivity analysis

Quantifying individual risk for binary outcomes

Abstract

Journal

Organization