.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Quantitative verification with adaptive uncertainty reduction
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jss.2022.111275.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Stochastic models are widely used to verify whether systems satisfy their reliability, performance and other nonfunctional requirements. However, the validity of the verification depends on how accurately the parameters of these models can be estimated using data from component unit testing, monitoring, system logs, etc. When insufficient data are available, the models are affected by epistemic parametric uncertainty, the verification results are inaccurate, and any engineering decisions based on them may be invalid. To address these problems, we introduce VERACITY, a tool-supported iterative approach for the efficient and accurate verification of nonfunctional requirements under epistemic parameter uncertainty. VERACITY integrates confidence-interval quantitative verification with a new adaptive uncertainty reduction heuristic that collects additional data about the parameters of the verified model by unit-testing specific system components over a series of verification iterations. VERACITY supports the quantitative verification of discrete-time Markov chains, deciding which components are to be tested in each iteration based on factors that include the sensitivity of the model to variations in the parameters of different components, and the overheads (e.g., time or cost) of unit-testing each of these components. We show the effectiveness and efficiency of VERACITY by using it for the verification of the nonfunctional requirements of a tele-assistance service-based system and an online shopping web application. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Quantitative verification
Probabilistic model checking
Confidence intervals
Uncertainty reduction
Nonfunctional requirements
Unit testing
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
4.1
Papers:
5.4K
Citations:
8.4K