arrow
Return

Quantum algorithms for causal estimands

delete2025-12-12
delete0
delete
OA
AI
R
Rishi S Goel *
C
Casey R. Myers
S
Sally Shrapnel
DOI:10.1088/2058-9565/ae20b8delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Modern machine learning (ML) methods typically fail to adequately capture causal information. Consequently, such models do not handle data distributional shifts, are vulnerable to adversarial examples, and often learn spurious correlations (Schölkopf and von Kügelgen 2022 (arXiv:2204.00607) [cs.AI]). Causal ML, or causal inference, aims to solve these issues by estimating the expected outcome of counterfactual events, using observational and/or interventional data, where causal relationships are typically depicted as directed acyclic graphs. It is an open question as to whether these causal algorithms provide opportunities for quantum enhancement. In this paper we consider a recently developed family of non-parametric, continuous causal estimators and derive quantum algorithms for these tasks. Kernel evaluation and large matrix inversion are critical sub-routines of these classical algorithms, which makes them particularly amenable to a quantum treatment. Unlike other quantum ML algorithms, closed form solutions for the estimators exist, negating the need for gradient evaluation and variational learning. We describe several new hybrid quantum–classical algorithms and show that uniform consistency of the estimators is retained. Furthermore, if one is satisfied with a quantum state output that is proportional to the true causal estimand, then these algorithms inherit the exponential complexity advantages given by quantum linear system solvers.
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Quantum Science and Technology cover
Quantum Science and Technology
IF:
5
Papers:
1.4K
Citations:
5.1K

Organization

Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Power of data in quantum machine learning
err2021-05-11
err296
errOAAI
errHuang, Hsin-Yuan; Broughton, Michael; Mohseni, Masoud; Babbush, Ryan; Boixo, Sergio; Neven, Hartmut; McClean, Jarrod R.
errShare
errSave
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
err2022-11-01
err343
errOAAI
errTilly, Jules; Chen, Hongxiang; Cao, Shuxiang; Picozzi, Dario; Setia, Kanav; Li, Ying; Grant, Edward; Wossnig, Leonard; Rungger, Ivan; Booth, George H.; Tennyson, Jonathan
errShare
errSave
Quantum state preparation using tensor networks
err2023-06-19
err10
errOAAI
errMelnikov, Ar A.; Termanova, A. A.; Dolgov, S., V; Neukart, F.; Perelshtein, M. R.
errShare
errSave
Quantum-inspired algorithms in practice
errQUANTUM
IF5.4
err2020-08-13
err49
errOAAI
errArrazola, Juan Miguel; Delgado, Alain; Bardhan, Bhaskar Roy; Lloyd, Seth
errShare
errSave
Adaptive Bayesian quantum tomography
err2012-05-22
err0
errOAAI
errF. Huszár; N. M. T. Houlsby
errShare
errSave
A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning
err2021-07-12
err265
PREAI
errLiu, Yunchao; Arunachalam, Srinivasan; Temme, Kristan
errShare
errSave
Numerical evidence against advantage with quantum fidelity kernels on classical data
err2023-06-20
err0
errOAAI
errLucas Slattery; Ruslan Shaydulin; Shouvanik Chakrabarti; Marco Pistoia; Sami Khairy; Stefan M. Wild
errShare
errSave
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
err2022-02-15
err0
PREAI
errKishor Bharti; Alba Cervera-Lierta; Thi Ha Kyaw; Tobias Haug; Sumner Alperin-Lea; Abhinav Anand; Matthias Degroote; Hermanni Heimonen; Jakob S. Kottmann; Tim Menke; Wai-Keong Mok; Sukin Sim; Leong-Chuan Kwek; Alán Aspuru-Guzik
errShare
errSave
researcher View more