.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Reasoning dialogues
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/1467-8721.00041.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
When people argue with others in conversation, the make a variety of conversational moves: They make claims, ask for justification of others' claims attack claims, and attack claims' justifications. The arrangement of these moves gives argumentation its characteristic shape. This article illustrates a proposed format for conversations of this type, and it reviews some findings about the way people understand and evaluate these conversations. The findings suggest that judgments of the arguers' burden depend not only on the content of their claims, but also,on the conversation's structure. In addition, judgments of the arguer's evidence or explanation-are a function of the arguments setting.
Keywords:
reasoning
argumentation
discourse understanding
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
5.8
Papers:
2.1K
Citations:
1.7W
Organization
No organization information available