.png){kind=icon}
Return
RECONCILING BAYESIAN AND PERIMETER REGULARIZATION FOR BINARY INVERSION
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1137/18M1179559.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
A central theme in classical algorithms for the reconstruction of discontinuous functions from observational data is perimeter regularization via the use of total variation. On the other hand, sparse or noisy data often demand a probabilistic approach to the reconstruction of images, to enable uncertainty quantification; the Bayesian approach to inversion, which itself introduces a form of regularization, is a natural framework in which to carry this out. In this paper the link between Bayesian inversion methods and perimeter regularization is explored. In this paper two links are studied: (i) the maximum a posteriori objective function of a suitably chosen Bayesian phase-field approach is shown to be closely related to a least squares plus perimeter regularization objective; (ii) sample paths of a suitably chosen Bayesian level set formulation are shown to possess a finite perimeter and to have the ability to learn about the true perimeter.
Keywords:
Bayesian inversion
phase field
level set method
perimeter regularization
gamma convergence
uncertainty quantification
Journal
IF:
2.6
Papers:
5.1K
Citations:
1.8W
Organization
View more organizations
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
ShareSave View more