.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Redefining ARDS: a paradigm shift
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1186/s13054-023-04699-w.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Although the defining elements of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been known for over a century, the syndrome was first described in 1967. Since then, despite several revisions of its conceptual definition, it remains a matter of debate whether ARDS is a discrete nosological entity. After almost 60 years, it is appropriate to examine how critical care has modeled this fascinating syndrome and affected patient's outcome. Given that the diagnostic criteria of ARDS (e.g., increased pulmonary vascular permeability and diffuse alveolar damage) are difficult to ascertain in clinical practice, we believe that a step forward would be to standardize the assessment of pulmonary and extrapulmonary involvement in ARDS to ensure that each patient can receive the most appropriate and effective treatment. The selection of treatments based on arbitrary ranges of PaO2/FiO2 lacks sufficient sensitivity to individualize patient care.
Keywords:
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
Definitions
Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
Mechanical ventilation
Standardization
Stratification
Prognosis
Clinical trials
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
9.3
Papers:
1.0W
Citations:
3.8W
View more organizations