.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Reexamining the Distributed Slack Bus
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2987325.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Power flow formulated with a distributed slack bus involves modeling the active-power output of each generator with three elements: a nominal injection modulated by a fraction of the net-load imbalance allocated via a participation factor. This setup acknowledges generator dynamics and system operations, but it has long been plagued by ambiguous and inconsistent interpretations of its constituent elemental quantities. In this paper, we establish that, with the: i) nominal active-power injections set to be the economic dispatch setpoints, ii) participation factors fixed to be the ones used in automatic generation control, and iii) net-load imbalance considered to be the total load and loss unaccounted in economic dispatch, the power flow solution best matches results from a simulation unto steady state of the system differential algebraic equation (DAE) model. Numerical case studies tailored to the New England test system validate the analysis by demonstrating that solutions obtained froma distributed slack formulation offer lower errors (with respect to DAE-model simulations) compared to the exhaustive set of all single slack bus choices.
Keywords:
Generators
Economics
Automatic generation control
Mathematical model
Load modeling
Power system dynamics
Numerical models
Automatic generation control
distributed slack bus
economic dispatch
participation factors
power flow
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
7.2
Papers:
1.1W
Citations:
5.0W