.png){kind=icon}
Return
Referee Recommendations
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1093/rfs/hhu029.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This paper quantitatively analyzes referee recommendations at eight prominent economics and finance journals, and the SFS (Society for Financial Studies) Cavalcade Conference, where a known algorithm matched referees to submissions. The behavior of referees was similar in all venues. The referee-specific component in the disposition recommendation was about twice as important as the common component. Referees differed both in their scales (some referees were intrinsically more generous than others) and in their opinions of what a good paper was (they often disagreed about the relative ordering of papers). (JEL A14)
Keywords:
JOURNALS
ECONOMICS
ARTICLES
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
5.4
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
3.0W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more