arrow
Return

Registration between DCT and EBSD datasets for multiphase microstructures

delete2023-10-01
delete3
delete
OA
AI
J
J. Ball
J
Jette Oddershede
C
Claire Davis
C
Carl Slater
M
Mohammed Said
H
Himanshu Vashishtha
Š
Š. Michalik
D
David M. Collins *
DOI:10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113228delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The ability to characterise the three-dimensional microstructure of multiphase materials is essential for understanding the interaction between phases and their associated materials properties. Here, laboratory-based diffraction-contrast tomography (lab-based DCT), a recently-established materials characterization technique that can determine grain phases, morphologies, positions and orientations in a voxel-based reconstruction method, was used to map part of a dual-phase steel alloy sample. To assess the resulting microstructures produced by the lab-based DCT technique, an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) map was collected within the same sample volume. To identify the two-dimensional (2D) slice of the three-dimensional (3D) lab-based DCT reconstruction that best corresponded to the 2D EBSD map, a novel registration technique based solely on grainaveraged orientations was developed - this registration technique requires very little a priori knowledge of dataset alignment and can be extended to other techniques that only recover grain-averaged orientation data such as far-field 3D X-ray diffraction microscopy. Once the corresponding 2D slice was identified in the lab-based DCT dataset, comparisons of phase balance, grain size, shape and texture were performed between lab-based DCT and EBSD techniques. More complicated aspects of the microstructural morphology such as grain boundary shape and grains less than a critical size were poorly reproduced by the lab-based DCT reconstruction, primarily due to the difference in resolutions of the technique compared with EBSD. However, lab-based DCT is shown to accurately determine the centre-of-mass position, orientation, and size of the large grains for each phase present, austenite and martensitic ferrite. The results reveals a complex ferrite grain network of similar crystal orientations that are absent from the EBSD dataset. Such detail demonstrates that lab-based DCT, as a technique, shows great promise in the field of multi-phase material characterization.
Keywords:
Diffraction-contrast tomography
Crystallographic texture
3D characterization
Grain morphology
Steel
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Materials Characterization cover
Materials Characterization
IF:
5.5
Papers:
1.1W
Citations:
3.4W

Organization

U
University of Birmingham
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 5.0W
D
Diamond Light Source
Scholars:
2.0K
Papers: 2.3K
Citations: 5.2K
U
University of Warwick
Scholars:
2.2W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 85
researcher View more organizations