arrow
Return

Reinforcement Learning, Fast and Slow

delete2019-05-01
delete377
delete
OA
AI
M
Matthew Botvinick *
S
Sam Ritter
J
Jane X. Wang
Z
Zeb Kurth‐Nelson
C
Charles Blundell
D
Demis Hassabis
DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.006delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) methods have driven impressive advances in artificial intelligence in recent years, exceeding human performance in domains ranging from Atari to Go to no-limit poker. This progress has drawn the attention of cognitive scientists interested in understanding human learning. However, the concern has been raised that deep RL may be too sample-inefficient that is, it may simply be too slow - to provide a plausible model of how humans learn. In the present review, we counter this critique by describing recently developed techniques that allow deep RL to operate more nimbly, solving problems much more quickly than previous methods. Although these techniques were developed in an AI context, we propose that they may have rich implications for psychology and neuroscience. A key insight, arising from these AI methods, concerns the fundamental connection between fast RL and slower, more incremental forms of learning.
Keywords:
PREFRONTAL CORTEX
NEURAL-NETWORKS
MODEL
PREDICTION
SYSTEMS
REWARD
DOPAMINE
MEMORY
BRAIN
GO
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Trends in Cognitive Sciences cover
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
IF:
17.2
Papers:
3.6K
Citations:
3.5W

Organization

U
university of london
Scholars:
21.3W
Papers: 19.6W
Citations: 305