arrow
Return

Religion re-explained

delete2017-07-11
delete49
PRE
AI
K
Kim Sterelny *
DOI:10.1080/2153599X.2017.1323779delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This article has three aims. First, it attempts to identify the exact problem religion poses to those developing an account of the evolution of human social life, and of the cognitive capacities that sustain that life. Having done that, the article aims to specify the criteria that an explanation of the evolution of religion should meet. Second, it presents a critique of one popular account: the idea that religion emerges as a result of cognitive biases that favor agentive thinking, that favor minimally counter-intuitive narratives, amplified and entrenched by some form of cultural evolution. Third, it sketches a positive account in which various forms of communal practice and quasi-religious activity precede the emergence of religious belief. The machinery of the cultural transmission of religion is built before religion transitions into (in part) an ideological system. I call this an ethnographic model of the evolution of religion, because the core ideas are implicit (and sometimes partly explicit) in ethnographically oriented anthropology of religion.
Keywords:
Evolution of religion
religion and cooperation
religion and signals
origins of ritual
religion and cultural evolution
evolution of symbolic behavior
HADD
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

R
Religion Brain and Behavior
IF:
3.4
Papers:
1.2K
Citations:
530

Organization

A
Australian National University
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 3.9W