.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Replies to Critics
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1177/00483931251380496.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
There are three prevalent themes among the critics. First, a call to advance the concept of social power by expanding on structural power and demonstrating how telic power can be operationalized. Second, the critics want a stronger objection to the collective intentionality claim (assumed by the standard model). Third, there is a need to clarify the concept of opaque kinds of social facts, especially in relation to economic class. I integrate Khalidi's clarification of opaqueness, elaborate on the concept of economic class, and introduce a new development of the power view by operationalizing telic power through an empirical case study.
Keywords:
opaque kinds of social facts
social power
structural power
the collective intentionality claim
Journal
P
IF:
0.4
Papers:
24
Citations:
0