.png){kind=icon}
Return
Representing dialogic argumentation
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.knosys.2005.08.002.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Dialogic argumentation is a crucial component in many computational domains, and forms a core component of argumentation theory. This paper compares two approaches to dialogue that have grown from two different disciplines; the descriptive-normative approach of applied philosophy, and the formal, implemented approach of computer science. The commonalities between the approaches are explored in developing a means for representing dialogic argumentation in a common format. This common format uses an XML-based language that views locutions as state-changing operations, drawing on an analogy with classical artificial intelligence planning. This representation is then shown to hold a number of important advantages in areas of artificial intelligence and philosophy. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
argumentation
dialogue
XML
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
K
IF:
7.6
Papers:
1.2W
Citations:
4.5W
Organization
No organization information available